</>macrostackBrowse all
Migration guide · No-Code Databases

The 4 best free & open-source Airtable alternatives

Airtable is a hosted no-code database platform that blends the familiarity of a spreadsheet with the structure of a relational database. Teams organize records in "bases," link tables together, and view the same data as a grid, kanban board, calendar, gallery, Gantt, or form. On top of the data layer, Interface Designer turns bases into shareable internal apps, and built-in automations run triggered actions (send an email, update a field, create a record). Everything runs in Airtable's cloud with no servers to manage, backed by a large template library and integrations with tools like Slack, Google Workspace, and Salesforce.

The cost

Free plan ($0) is capped at 1,000 records per base, 1 GB attachments, and 100 automation runs/month (up to 5 editors). Team is $20/seat/month billed annually (about $24 monthly) with 50,000 records per base and 25,000 automation runs/month. Business is $45/seat/month annually (about $54 monthly) with 125,000 records per base, SSO, and an admin panel. Enterprise Scale is custom-priced with up to 500,000 records per base. Verified against Airtable's published plans as of July 2026.

Why people consider an alternative

People typically look for alternatives on cost, scaling limits, and data control. Pricing is per seat, so the bill tracks your headcount rather than your usage — adding collaborators raises the cost even if their work is light. Separately, each base has a hard record cap (1,000 on Free, 50,000 on Team, 125,000 on Business), and an active CRM or inventory can reach those limits sooner than teams expect, forcing an upgrade. All data lives in Airtable's cloud with no self-hosted option, which can matter for privacy, compliance, or offline needs. Teams that want flat or usage-independent cost, no row caps, or their data on their own infrastructure tend to evaluate open-source and self-hostable databases.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
BaserowMIT (core); premium/enterprise modules under separate commercial licensesYesFree to self-host (MIT core); paid cloud and self-hosted premium/enterprise tiers available93
GristApache-2.0 (grist-core)YesFree / self-host (grist-core); optional managed cloud and paid full edition available96
TeableAGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise Edition under a separate commercial licenseYesFree to self-host (Community Edition); paid cloud and Enterprise Edition tiers available91
NocoDBSustainable Use License v1.0 (source-available, fair-code; not OSI-approved) — changed from AGPL-3.0 in Jan 2026YesFree to self-host for internal/personal use; commercial license required to offer it as a managed service; paid cloud available78
93
Macrostack's top pick

Baserow

MIT-core, self-hostable no-code database with the closest Airtable-style experience.

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

Baserow

MIT-core, self-hostable no-code database with the closest Airtable-style experience.

93
OPEN SOURCEMIT (core); premium/enterprise modules under separate commercial licensesSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Baserow is an open-source no-code database and app builder that feels close to Airtable: grid, kanban, calendar, timeline, form, and gallery views over linked tables, plus a visual app/dashboard composer and built-in automations. Its core platform is MIT-licensed and self-hostable via Docker, and when you host it yourself there are no row or API caps. It follows an open-core model — some advanced features live in separate premium and enterprise tiers under their own commercial licenses — but the MIT core is fully sufficient for most self-hosting teams.

Strengths

  • +MIT-licensed core is OSI-approved and genuinely open
  • +Self-hosted via Docker; your data and workflows stay on your own infrastructure
  • +Closest Airtable-style experience here (grid, kanban, calendar, form views, linked tables, app builder)
  • +No row, collaborator, or API limits when you self-host the core
  • +Very active project with frequent releases and a growing plugin ecosystem

Trade-offs

  • Open-core: some advanced field types and enterprise features sit behind separate commercial licenses, not MIT
  • Self-hosting requires running and maintaining PostgreSQL, Redis, and the app containers
  • You are responsible for backups, updates, and SSL yourself
  • Smaller template and integration library than Airtable's
Free to self-host (MIT core); paid cloud and self-hosted premium/enterprise tiers available
#2

Grist

Apache-2.0 relational spreadsheet with Python formulas and portable, self-contained documents.

96
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0 (grist-core)SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 11kupdated today

Grist (grist-core) is an open-source relational spreadsheet that combines a familiar spreadsheet UI with database structure: typed columns, linked references, and full Python formulas alongside standard functions. It is the most permissively licensed and lightest option here — grist-core is Apache-2.0, stores each document as a portable self-contained file (SQLite under the hood), works offline, and even offers a desktop app. It runs comfortably on modest hardware via Docker. Grist Labs sells a full edition with extra enterprise features, but grist-core itself is fully open and free to self-host.

Strengths

  • +grist-core is Apache-2.0, an OSI-approved permissive license
  • +Documents are portable, self-contained files (SQLite) that you fully own and can back up or move
  • +Works offline and runs on modest hardware; there is even a desktop app
  • +Python formulas plus spreadsheet functions give powerful automation without external services
  • +Granular access control down to cell level, with a REST API for export and integration

Trade-offs

  • More of a relational-spreadsheet model than a polished app builder; fewer turnkey app-building features than Baserow
  • Some enterprise features (e.g. certain storage backends, SSO options) are only in the paid full edition
  • You manage availability, backups, and upgrades yourself when self-hosting
  • Community momentum is steady rather than fast-moving
Free / self-host (grist-core); optional managed cloud and paid full edition available
#3

Teable

AGPL-3.0 no-code interface built directly on PostgreSQL, designed to scale to millions of rows.

91
OPEN SOURCEAGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise Edition under a separate commercial licenseSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 21kupdated today

Teable is a no-code database that puts a fast, spreadsheet-like Airtable-style interface directly on top of PostgreSQL. Because your data lives in a real Postgres database you control, it handles large tables well and stays queryable with standard SQL tools. The Community Edition is AGPL-3.0 and free to self-host via Docker. A separate Enterprise Edition adds features such as AI, an authority matrix, automation, and advanced admin under a commercial license, so confirm the CE covers what you need before deploying.

Strengths

  • +Community Edition is AGPL-3.0, a strong copyleft OSI-approved license
  • +Data lives in standard PostgreSQL you control, so it stays accessible with normal SQL tooling
  • +Built to handle large datasets (millions of rows) without hard row caps when self-hosted
  • +Very active project with frequent releases and rapid feature development

Trade-offs

  • Several higher-end features (AI, automation, authority matrix, advanced admin) are Enterprise-only under a commercial license
  • Self-hosting requires running and maintaining PostgreSQL and the app stack
  • Younger project than Grist, so some areas are still maturing
  • AGPL-3.0 copyleft terms may need legal review for certain redistribution scenarios
Free to self-host (Community Edition); paid cloud and Enterprise Edition tiers available
#4

NocoDB

Turns an existing SQL database into a smart no-code interface; now source-available, not OSI open-source.

78
SOURCE-AVAILABLESustainable Use License v1.0 (source-available, fair-code; not OSI-approved) — changed from AGPL-3.0 in Jan 2026SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 64kupdated today

NocoDB puts an Airtable-style no-code interface (grid, kanban, gallery, calendar, forms) on top of a database you already run — MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and more — which gives it excellent data ownership, since your records stay in your own standard SQL database. It is free to self-host via Docker for internal use. Important licensing note: as of January 2026 NocoDB moved from AGPL-3.0 to the Sustainable Use License (SUL), a source-available "fair-code" license — many secondary sites still list the old AGPL label. Self-hosting for your own internal or personal use remains free; offering NocoDB itself as a hosted or managed service to others requires a commercial license.

Strengths

  • +Sits on top of your own MySQL/PostgreSQL/SQLite database, so your data stays in a standard SQL store you control
  • +Free to self-host for internal and personal use, with full source access
  • +Familiar no-code views (grid, kanban, gallery, calendar, forms) plus an automatic REST API
  • +Extremely active project with a very large community and frequent releases

Trade-offs

  • License is source-available (Sustainable Use License), not OSI-approved open-source, and restricts offering NocoDB itself as a paid/managed service
  • The Jan 2026 relicense from AGPL-3.0 means older "AGPL" references you may find are out of date
  • Self-hosting means running and maintaining the app and its backing database
  • As an interface layer, it depends on a separate SQL database you provision and manage
Free to self-host for internal/personal use; commercial license required to offer it as a managed service; paid cloud available

Questions people ask

Is there a truly free, self-hosted alternative to Airtable?

Yes. Baserow (MIT core), Grist (Apache-2.0 grist-core), and Teable (AGPL-3.0 Community Edition) are OSI-licensed open-source projects you can run for free on your own server via Docker, with no per-seat pricing and no self-hosted row caps. NocoDB is also free to self-host for internal use, but note it moved to the source-available Sustainable Use License in January 2026, so it is not OSI open-source. All keep your data on infrastructure you control.

Which one is closest to the Airtable experience?

Baserow is generally the closest in feel — grid, kanban, calendar, and form views over linked tables, plus a visual app builder and automations. Teable offers a similar spreadsheet-style interface backed by real PostgreSQL. Grist leans more toward a powerful relational spreadsheet with Python formulas, and NocoDB is best when you want to put a no-code interface on a SQL database you already run.

Is NocoDB still open-source?

Not in the OSI sense anymore. As of January 2026 NocoDB is released under the Sustainable Use License, a source-available "fair-code" license. You can self-host and use it for free for internal or personal purposes, but the license restricts offering NocoDB itself as a hosted or managed service to others without a commercial license. If you specifically need an OSI-approved license, Baserow (MIT core), Grist (Apache-2.0), or Teable (AGPL-3.0 CE) are better fits.

When is Airtable still the better choice?

If you want zero servers to maintain, a large template and integration library, Interface Designer for polished internal apps, and fast setup with vendor support, Airtable remains a strong, convenient option — especially for small, stable teams whose data fits comfortably within the record limits. Self-hosted alternatives pay off most when per-seat cost at scale, record caps, data privacy, or control over your own infrastructure matter more than turnkey convenience.

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-07-07. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.