</>macrostack
Migration guide · Backend as a service

The 5 best Firebase alternatives

Firebase is Google's backend-as-a-service: Firestore for the database, Authentication for sign-in, Cloud Storage for files, Cloud Functions for server logic, plus hosting, analytics and push notifications. It exists so a mobile or front-end team can ship a real product without hiring anyone to run a backend, and at that job it is genuinely excellent — which is why it has been the default for a decade.

91
Bottom line

Firebase is still the fastest way to get a real backend without a backend team, and its bill only becomes a problem at scale or after a careless query. If you want the same speed on a database you can take with you, Supabase is Postgres with Firebase's ergonomics.

Jump to the full comparison →

The cost

The Spark tier is free with hard quotas. Beyond it, Blaze is pay-as-you-go and metered on operations rather than seats: roughly $0.06 per 100,000 document reads, $0.18 per 100,000 writes and $0.02 per 100,000 deletes on Firestore, with Realtime Database around $5 per GB stored and $1 per GB downloaded. A modest app at 5,000 daily users lands near $12 a month. The number that surprises people is not the rate, it is the shape — a badly written listener that re-reads a collection on every render costs the same as a feature nobody asked for. Figures checked 2026-07-31.

Why people consider an alternative

Cost that tracks your code quality rather than your revenue is the first reason: read-heavy patterns are easy to write and expensive to run, and the bill arrives a month after the mistake. The second is Firestore itself — a proprietary document store with no SQL, limited querying, and no way to run it anywhere else, so the data model you build against is one vendor's product rather than a standard. The third is that the open equivalents have genuinely caught up. Supabase gives you Postgres, which means SQL, joins, extensions and thirty years of tooling.

When Firebase is still the right call

Stay if you are shipping fast and the bill is small — Blaze at $12 a month is not a problem worth a migration, and Firebase's client SDKs, offline sync and push notifications are still the smoothest in the category. Stay if your app is genuinely mobile-first: the offline-first behaviour in the Firebase SDKs is better than anything the alternatives offer, and rebuilding it yourself is a real project. Stay if you are already deep in Google Cloud, where IAM, BigQuery export and Analytics integration all just work. And stay if nobody on the team wants to own a Postgres instance.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
SupabaseApache-2.0YesFree tier for small projects; hosted Pro from about $25/month. Fully self-hostable at no licence cost.91
PocketBaseMITYesFree and open source. You pay for a server, and a very small one will do.95
AppwriteBSD-3-ClauseYesFree and open source to self-host. Appwrite Cloud has a free tier and paid plans from about $15/month.92
Parse PlatformApache-2.0YesFree and open source. You supply the Node host and the database.90
NhostMITYesFree tier available; hosted plans from about $25/month. Self-hostable at no licence cost.88
91
Macrostack's top pick

Supabase

Postgres with Firebase's ergonomics — and you can take the database with you.

Which one fits your situation?

There is no single best answer — it depends on what you are actually trying to do.

Just tell me the best Firebase alternative

Supabase91

Our top pick — the highest Sovereignty Score at 91, and the one we would choose ourselves.

Supabase vs PocketBase

I have no budget — is there a genuinely free one?

PocketBase95

Open source under MIT. Free and open source. You pay for a server, and a very small one will do.

PocketBase vs Supabase

I want to self-host it and own the data

Appwrite92

Self-hostable, so your data stays on your own server. Free and open source to self-host. Appwrite Cloud has a free tier and paid plans from about $15/month.

Appwrite vs Supabase

It is just me — I do not want to run a server

Nhost88

Offers a hosted option, so you can start without infrastructure. Free tier available; hosted plans from about $25/month. Self-hostable at no licence cost.

Nhost vs Supabase

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

Supabase

Postgres with Firebase's ergonomics — and you can take the database with you.

91
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Supabase wraps a real Postgres database in the things that made Firebase pleasant: instant REST and GraphQL APIs, row-level security, authentication, file storage, realtime subscriptions and edge functions. The difference that matters is underneath. Your data is in Postgres, so you get SQL, joins, transactions, extensions like PostGIS and pgvector, and the ability to pick up the database and run it on any host on earth. It is Apache-2.0 and self-hostable with Docker Compose, and the hosted tier exists for people who would rather not. Around 107k GitHub stars and pushed to daily.

Strengths

  • +Real Postgres — SQL, joins, transactions and the whole extension ecosystem
  • +Genuinely portable: the database runs anywhere, hosted or not
  • +Apache-2.0 with a complete self-host path, not a crippled community edition
  • +pgvector built in, so AI features do not need a second database

Trade-offs

  • You now have a Postgres database to think about — indexes, connections, vacuum
  • Mobile offline sync is weaker than Firebase's SDKs
  • Self-hosting the full stack is more moving parts than the hosted product suggests
  • Younger than Firebase; some edges are still being filed off
Free tier for small projects; hosted Pro from about $25/month. Fully self-hostable at no licence cost.
#2

PocketBase

The entire backend is one file you can copy to a server.

95
OPEN SOURCEMITSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

PocketBase is a single Go binary containing an embedded SQLite database, authentication, file storage, realtime subscriptions and an admin UI. There is no Docker, no cluster, no dependency list — you download one executable, run it, and you have a backend. For a side project, an internal tool or an MVP it is the least ceremony available anywhere, and the fact that your entire production database is a file you can copy is a real feature rather than a limitation. MIT, about 60.4k stars. The honest constraint is SQLite: superb up to a point, and that point is a single machine.

Strengths

  • +One binary, no dependencies — the simplest deployment in this comparison
  • +Your whole database is a file you can copy, back up and version
  • +Extremely fast for read-heavy workloads on modest hardware
  • +MIT, no enterprise edition, no upsell path

Trade-offs

  • SQLite means one machine — no horizontal scaling story
  • Smaller feature surface than Firebase or Supabase
  • Effectively a single-maintainer project, which is a real risk to weigh
  • Not the right choice for an app expecting millions of concurrent users
Free and open source. You pay for a server, and a very small one will do.
#3

Appwrite

The self-hosted backend that ships as one Docker command.

92
OPEN SOURCEBSD-3-ClauseSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Appwrite bundles databases, authentication with 30-plus OAuth providers, storage, serverless functions and realtime into a product designed from the start to be self-hosted — one `docker compose up` and you have the whole backend running on your own machine. Where Supabase leads with Postgres, Appwrite leads with operational simplicity, and the SDK coverage across Flutter, web, Apple and Android is unusually complete. BSD-3-Clause, around 56.7k stars. It is the pick when you want to own the whole stack without becoming a database administrator to do it.

Strengths

  • +Self-hosts in a single Docker Compose command — the lowest-friction option here
  • +Excellent SDK coverage including Flutter, Apple and Android
  • +Permissive BSD-3-Clause with no enterprise directory carve-out
  • +Auth, storage, functions and realtime all in one binary set

Trade-offs

  • Its own database abstraction rather than raw Postgres — less portable data
  • Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations than Supabase
  • Query capability is thinner than SQL when the data model gets complex
  • Scaling beyond a single node needs planning
Free and open source to self-host. Appwrite Cloud has a free tier and paid plans from about $15/month.
#4

Parse Platform

The original backend-as-a-service, now community-run and still going.

90
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Parse was Facebook's backend-as-a-service until it was shut down in 2017 — and rather than dying, it was open-sourced and picked up by the community, which has maintained it ever since. That history is the point: it is the one product in this comparison that has already survived its vendor walking away, which is the exact scenario this page exists to help you plan for. Apache-2.0, around 21.4k stars, still actively pushed. It runs on Node with MongoDB or Postgres, and the SDK coverage for iOS, Android and JavaScript remains broad.

Strengths

  • +Already survived its parent company shutting it down — the proof case for open source
  • +Apache-2.0 with a decade of community stewardship
  • +Runs on MongoDB or Postgres, your choice
  • +Mature SDKs across iOS, Android and JavaScript

Trade-offs

  • Feels its age next to Supabase and Appwrite
  • You assemble the pieces — Node host, database, dashboard — yourself
  • Community-maintained means no commercial support by default
  • Smaller momentum than the newer options
Free and open source. You supply the Node host and the database.
#5

Nhost

Postgres plus instant GraphQL, for teams that think in queries.

88
OPEN SOURCEMITSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Nhost pairs Postgres with Hasura to give you a GraphQL API generated straight from your schema, alongside authentication, storage and serverless functions. If your front end is React or Vue and your team already prefers GraphQL to REST, this is the shortest path from a database table to a typed query in the client. MIT, self-hostable, with a hosted tier. It is the smallest project here at around 9.3k stars, which is the caveat — the technology is sound and the ecosystem is thin.

Strengths

  • +Instant GraphQL from your Postgres schema via Hasura
  • +Real Postgres underneath, so the data stays portable
  • +MIT licensed with a genuine self-host path
  • +Strong typed-client story for React and Vue front ends

Trade-offs

  • Much smaller community than Supabase or Appwrite
  • GraphQL-first is a commitment, not a neutral default
  • Self-hosting means running Hasura and Postgres, not one binary
  • Fewer SDKs, and mobile support lags the others
Free tier available; hosted plans from about $25/month. Self-hostable at no licence cost.

Questions people ask

Is Firebase expensive?

Not inherently — a 5,000-daily-user app on Blaze lands near $12 a month. What catches people out is that Firestore bills per document read, so an inefficient listener can multiply the bill without changing what the app does. The cost tracks your query patterns rather than your revenue.

What is the best open-source Firebase alternative?

Supabase, for most teams. It gives you Firebase's ergonomics on top of real Postgres, so you keep SQL, joins and extensions and the database stays portable. It is Apache-2.0 and fully self-hostable. Choose Appwrite instead if the priority is the simplest possible self-hosting, or PocketBase if the whole backend fitting in one file appeals more than horizontal scale.

How hard is it to migrate off Firebase?

The data is easy and the queries are not. Firestore documents export cleanly, but every query, security rule and Cloud Function written against a document store needs rewriting for a relational one. Firebase Authentication is the sharper edge: records export, but session handling built on Firebase's client SDKs has to be rebuilt rather than repointed.

Compare them head-to-head

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-07-31. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.