macrostack
Browse

The AI stack

Categories

Local & Sovereign AINotes & KnowledgeObservability & MonitoringPassword ManagersWeb AnalyticsTeam ChatSmart HomeNetworking & RoutersVideo ConferencingCloud Storage & SyncPhotos & MediaAPI DevelopmentImage EditingWorkflow Automation & iPaaSDeveloper Tools & ContainersOffice & Productivity SuitesNo-Code DatabasesCode Hosting & Git ForgesProject ManagementEmail Marketing & NewslettersScheduling & BookingError Tracking & Exception MonitoringLog Management & SIEMVPN & PrivacyEmail & Secure MailVector Databases & AI SearchLLM & Agent FrameworksDomains & Web HostingData Removal & PrivacyAuthentication & IdentityHelp Desk & Customer SupportCloud & VPSKubernetes & Container PlatformsEmbedding ModelsPDF & DocumentsAI Coding AssistantsAI Voice & SpeechLLM Observability & EvaluationLLM Gateways & RoutingCloud GPU & AI ComputeCI/CD & build automationData & pipeline orchestrationModel serving & inferenceAI agent frameworksBackend as a serviceSecrets managementFeature flags & experimentationProduct analyticsSearch infrastructureUptime & status monitoringAffiliate & partner platformsVisitor identification & personalisationWikis & internal docsIdentity & access managementData warehouses & analytics enginesCustomer data platformsCRMObject storageBI & dashboardsE-signatureWhiteboards & diagrammingIn-memory data stores & cachingPlatform as a serviceTransactional & bulk emailHeadless CMSDesign & prototypingE-commerce platformsInternal tools & admin panelsManaged databasesForms & surveysFine-Tuning & Model TrainingRAG & Retrieval PlatformsLLM Evaluation & TestingAI Guardrails & Content SafetySpeech Recognition & TranscriptionExperiment Tracking & ML OpsDocument AI & OCR

About

How we rank & score
Migration guide · Platform as a service

The 5 best Heroku alternatives

Heroku invented the modern platform-as-a-service: `git push heroku main` and your application is running, with the database, TLS, logging and scaling handled. It defined what developers expect deployment to feel like, and almost every product in this category is measured against it whether or not they admit it.

94
Bottom line

Coolify on a $12 VPS gives you most of the Heroku experience for a tenth of the cost, if you are willing to own a server. Railway if you want the experience without the server. Heroku itself is now a premium you pay for maturity and compliance rather than capability.

Jump to the full comparison →

The cost

Eco dynos are about $5/month for 1,000 shared hours; Basic $7 per dyno; Standard-1X $25 and Standard-2X $50; Performance dynos $250 and $500. Managed Postgres starts around $5 and reaches four figures. The free tier was removed in November 2022, which is when a large part of the community left. A modest production app with two Standard dynos and a mid-tier database lands near $150/month for what a $20 VPS could run. Figures checked 2026-08-05.

Why people consider an alternative

The multiple. A Standard-2X dyno is $50/month for roughly 1GB of memory, against a $12 VPS with four times that — and once you know the number it is hard to unknow. The second reason is trust: removing the free tier in 2022 was legitimate business but it ended a decade of goodwill overnight and pushed a generation of developers to look at what else existed. The third is that they found something. Coolify and Dokku now reproduce most of the Heroku experience on hardware you rent directly, and Railway and Render reproduce it as a service at a lower price.

When Heroku is still the right call

Stay if the team has no operational capacity and the bill is small — $150/month buys back attention you may not have to spare, and that is a legitimate trade. Stay for compliance: Heroku Shield carries HIPAA and PCI certification that self-hosting cannot replicate cheaply. Stay if you are inside the Salesforce estate where the integration matters. And stay if you are pre-product-market-fit, because time spent operating servers at that stage is time spent on the wrong thing.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
CoolifyApache-2.0YesFree and open source. You pay only for the server. Paid cloud option available.94
DokkuMITYesFree and open source. You supply the server.95
CapRoverApache-2.0YesFree and open source. You supply the server.93
RailwayProprietary (hosted service)NoUsage-based with a small monthly minimum; typically well below Heroku for comparable workloads.34
RenderProprietary (hosted service)NoFree tier for small services; paid instances from about $7/month. Checked 2026-08-05.33
94
Macrostack's top pick

Coolify

Self-hosted Heroku — one server, Apache-2.0, everything included.

Which one fits your situation?

There is no single best answer — it depends on what you are actually trying to do.

Just tell me the best Heroku alternative

Coolify94

Our top pick — the highest Sovereignty Score at 94, and the one we would choose ourselves.

Coolify vs Dokku

I have no budget — is there a genuinely free one?

Dokku95

Open source under MIT. Free and open source. You supply the server.

Dokku vs Coolify

I want to self-host it and own the data

CapRover93

Self-hostable, so your data stays on your own server. Free and open source. You supply the server.

CapRover vs Coolify

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

Coolify

Self-hosted Heroku — one server, Apache-2.0, everything included.

94
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Coolify installs on a plain VPS and gives you Git-push deployment, automatic TLS, databases, backups, preview environments and a dashboard that non-specialists can use. Apache-2.0 with around 60k stars, and its growth over the past two years has been the clearest signal in this category. On a $12 server it will comfortably run several applications with their databases — the same work Heroku would bill well over $100 for. You are trading a monthly invoice for a server you now own, and for many teams that is the correct trade rather than a compromise.

Strengths

  • +Roughly a tenth of Heroku's cost for equivalent workloads
  • +Apache-2.0 with no enterprise carve-out
  • +Git-push deployment, automatic TLS, databases and backups included
  • +Interface good enough that non-specialists can use it

Trade-offs

  • You own the server — patching, uptime and backups are yours
  • Single-server by default; multi-node is more involved
  • Younger than Dokku with a shorter production record
  • No compliance certifications
Free and open source. You pay only for the server. Paid cloud option available.
#2

Dokku

The original self-hosted PaaS — small, stable, unglamorous.

95
OPEN SOURCEMITSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Dokku has been doing this since 2013 and describes itself accurately as the smallest PaaS implementation you have seen: Git-push deployment via Docker, Heroku buildpack support so existing apps often deploy unchanged, and a plugin system for databases and TLS. MIT, around 32k stars. It has no web interface — everything is the command line — and that is deliberate. For someone comfortable in a terminal it is the most dependable option here, and it has outlived several better-funded competitors.

Strengths

  • +Over a decade of stability; genuinely mature
  • +Heroku buildpack support means many apps deploy unchanged
  • +MIT and very light — runs on a small VPS
  • +Extremely well documented for command-line use

Trade-offs

  • No web interface at all
  • Single-server by design
  • Assumes comfort with the command line
  • Fewer batteries included than Coolify
Free and open source. You supply the server.
#3

CapRover

Self-hosted PaaS with a proper web UI and one-click apps.

93
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

CapRover sits between Dokku's command line and Coolify's polish: a web dashboard, one-click installers for around a hundred common applications, automatic TLS and Docker Swarm underneath for multi-node scaling. Around 15k stars. Its distinguishing feature is that Swarm foundation — of the self-hosted options it has the most straightforward path from one server to several. Development is steady rather than fast, which shows next to Coolify's pace.

Strengths

  • +Clean web UI with one-click installs for common applications
  • +Docker Swarm underneath — the clearest multi-node path here
  • +Apache-2.0 and mature
  • +Automatic TLS and simple domain handling

Trade-offs

  • Development pace is slower than Coolify's
  • Swarm is a fading technology relative to Kubernetes
  • Fewer integrations than Coolify
  • Interface feels dated
Free and open source. You supply the server.
#4

Railway

The Heroku experience, without owning a server.

34
SOURCE-AVAILABLEProprietary (hosted service)

Railway is the closest thing to what Heroku felt like in its best years: connect a repository, it detects the framework, provisions the database and deploys — with usage-based pricing that is typically well below Heroku for equivalent work. Proprietary and hosted, which is the honest trade. Included because for a great many teams the real choice is not self-hosted versus managed but which managed provider, and pretending everyone should run a server would not serve the reader.

Strengths

  • +Best developer experience of anything in this comparison
  • +Usage-based pricing rather than fixed dyno tiers
  • +Nothing to operate, patch or back up
  • +Databases, cron and private networking built in

Trade-offs

  • Proprietary and hosted — a vendor dependency, same as Heroku
  • Usage pricing is harder to forecast than fixed dynos
  • Smaller company than Salesforce, with the risk that implies
  • No self-host option
Usage-based with a small monthly minimum; typically well below Heroku for comparable workloads.
#5

Render

The predictable managed option, with a real free tier.

33
SOURCE-AVAILABLEProprietary (hosted service)

Render offers web services, static sites, cron jobs, managed Postgres and Redis at fixed, legible prices, with a free tier that genuinely works for small projects — the thing Heroku removed. It is deliberately less clever than Railway and more predictable as a result, which for a team that wants to know next month's bill is the more useful property. Proprietary and hosted. It is the straightforward commercial answer for anyone who left Heroku over price but does not want to become a system administrator.

Strengths

  • +A real free tier — the thing Heroku removed in 2022
  • +Fixed, predictable pricing rather than usage-based
  • +Managed Postgres and Redis included
  • +Straightforward migration path from Heroku

Trade-offs

  • Proprietary and hosted
  • Free tier services sleep when idle
  • Fewer regions than the hyperscalers
  • Less flexible than Railway for unusual setups
Free tier for small services; paid instances from about $7/month. Checked 2026-08-05.

Questions people ask

How much does Heroku cost now?

Eco dynos about $5/month, Basic $7, Standard-1X $25, Standard-2X $50, Performance $250 and $500, with managed Postgres from around $5 into four figures. A modest production app with two Standard dynos and a mid-tier database lands near $150/month — for work a $12 VPS could handle.

What is the best self-hosted Heroku alternative?

Coolify for most teams: Apache-2.0, installs on a plain VPS, and gives you Git-push deployment, TLS, databases and backups with an interface non-specialists can use. Dokku if you prefer the command line and want a decade of stability. Both cost roughly a tenth of Heroku for equivalent workloads.

Is it worth self-hosting to save money?

It depends entirely on whether you have the attention to spare. Coolify on a $12 server replaces $150/month of Heroku, which is real. But you now own patching, uptime and backups, and an outage at 3am is yours. Pre-product-market-fit, paying Heroku to not think about servers is frequently the better trade.

Compare them head-to-head

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-08-05. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.