</>macrostackBrowse all
Migration guide · Project Management

The 4 best free & open-source Jira alternatives

Jira is Atlassian's project management and issue-tracking platform, widely used by software and product teams to plan, track, and manage work. Teams organize work as issues (tasks, stories, bugs, epics) inside projects, then visualize them on Scrum and Kanban boards, backlogs, timelines, calendars, and dashboards. It supports customizable workflows, automation rules, reporting, and a large Marketplace of third-party apps and integrations. Jira is offered primarily as a managed cloud service in Free, Standard, Premium, and Enterprise tiers, with a self-managed Data Center edition for organizations that need to run it on their own infrastructure. It integrates closely with the wider Atlassian stack (Confluence, Bitbucket, Jira Service Management).

The cost

Jira Cloud is free for up to 10 users. Paid Cloud plans are billed per user: Standard is about $7.91/user/month and Premium about $14.54/user/month on annual billing, with a custom-priced Enterprise tier (annual only). Prices step down at higher user tiers. The self-managed Data Center edition uses quote-based annual licensing priced by user band, which for larger deployments runs into the tens of thousands of dollars per year before infrastructure and administration costs. Verified against Atlassian's published pricing as of July 2026; confirm current figures with Atlassian, as pricing changes over time.

Why people consider an alternative

People typically look for alternatives on cost, data control, and ecosystem complexity. Jira Cloud is priced per user, so the bill scales with headcount, and teams that also adopt Confluence, Jira Service Management, Atlassian Guard, or Marketplace apps can see the effective per-user cost climb well above the base Jira price. Organizations with strict data-residency, compliance, or offline requirements may want their project data on infrastructure they fully control; on Cloud that data lives in Atlassian's environment, and the self-managed Data Center edition carries a substantial annual license. Some teams also find Jira's configurability heavier than they need. Those who want flat or usage-independent cost, full self-hosting, or a lighter tool tend to evaluate open-source project management platforms.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
OpenProjectGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise add-ons under a separate commercial subscriptionYesFree to self-host (Community Edition, GPL-3.0); paid Enterprise cloud/on-premises tiers from about €5.95/user/month for premium and security add-ons95
PlaneAGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise edition under a separate commercial licenseYesFree to self-host (Community Edition, AGPL-3.0); paid cloud and Enterprise tiers available92
RedmineGPL-2.0-or-laterYesFree / self-host (GPL-2.0-or-later); costs are hosting, maintenance, and optional third-party support only90
TaigaAGPL-3.0 (frontend, relicensed 2024); MPL-2.0 (backend) — both OSI-approvedYesFree / self-host (open-source); optional paid hosted cloud plans available from Taiga88
95
Macrostack's top pick

OpenProject

GPL-3.0 self-hosted project management with Gantt, agile boards, and portfolio features in the free Community Edition.

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

OpenProject

GPL-3.0 self-hosted project management with Gantt, agile boards, and portfolio features in the free Community Edition.

95
OPEN SOURCEGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise add-ons under a separate commercial subscriptionSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 16kupdated today

OpenProject is a mature, GPL-3.0 open-source project management platform developed by OpenProject GmbH in Germany. Its free, self-hosted Community Edition covers a broad feature set — work packages, Scrum and Kanban boards, Gantt-based scheduling, time tracking and cost reporting, wikis, and portfolio management — with unlimited users and projects. A separate Enterprise edition (cloud or on-premises) adds premium and security add-ons such as SSO and certain admin features under a paid subscription. It is a strong fit for teams that want a comprehensive, Jira-style tool they run and own themselves, particularly where EU data residency and GDPR alignment matter.

Strengths

  • +GPL-3.0 Community Edition is genuinely open-source and free for unlimited users and projects
  • +Broad, mature feature set including Gantt scheduling, agile boards, time tracking, cost reporting, and portfolio management
  • +Fully self-hosted via Docker or native packages, so your project data stays on infrastructure you control
  • +EU-based vendor with GDPR-aligned self-hosting; the GPL-3.0 license reduces the risk of a restrictive relicense
  • +REST API and active, regular release cadence from a dedicated core team

Trade-offs

  • SSO/2FA and some advanced admin and security features are reserved for the paid Enterprise edition
  • Runs on a Ruby on Rails + PostgreSQL stack that needs a real server and ongoing maintenance, not a one-click app
  • You are responsible for backups, updates, database migrations, and SSL when self-hosting
  • Heavier to deploy and operate than lightweight tools, which can be more than a small team needs
Free to self-host (Community Edition, GPL-3.0); paid Enterprise cloud/on-premises tiers from about €5.95/user/month for premium and security add-ons
#2

Plane

AGPL-3.0, modern open-source project management for issues, cycles, and roadmaps — a lighter, contemporary Jira alternative.

92
OPEN SOURCEAGPL-3.0 (Community Edition); Enterprise edition under a separate commercial licenseSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 54kupdated today

Plane is a modern, AGPL-3.0 open-source project management platform built by Plane Software Inc. Its free Community Edition offers work items, cycles (sprints), modules (epics), roadmaps, and a built-in wiki with a clean, contemporary UI, plus a REST API and webhooks. It is self-hostable via Docker or Kubernetes and includes importers from Jira, Linear, and Asana. A separate Commercial/Enterprise edition adds features such as SSO/SAML, air-gapped deployment, and advanced admin under a commercial license. Plane suits product and engineering teams who want a fast, current alternative to Jira without the heavier configuration surface.

Strengths

  • +AGPL-3.0 Community Edition is OSI-approved open-source and free to self-host with unlimited users and projects
  • +Modern, polished UI with cycles, modules, roadmaps, and a built-in wiki
  • +Self-hostable via Docker or Kubernetes; your data stays on infrastructure you control
  • +Built-in importers from Jira, Linear, and Asana ease migration
  • +Very active project with frequent releases and a large, fast-growing community

Trade-offs

  • SSO/SAML, air-gapped deployment, and some advanced features require the paid Enterprise edition
  • A production self-hosted stack runs several services (Postgres, Redis/Valkey, object storage, message broker, proxy), so it is operationally substantial
  • Younger than Redmine or OpenProject, so some enterprise areas are still maturing
  • AGPL-3.0 network-copyleft terms may need legal review if you modify it and offer it as a service to others
Free to self-host (Community Edition, AGPL-3.0); paid cloud and Enterprise tiers available
#3

Redmine

GPL-2.0 veteran project management and issue tracker — lightweight, extensible, and runs on modest hardware.

90
OPEN SOURCEGPL-2.0-or-laterSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 6.0kupdated today

Redmine is a long-established, GPL-2.0-or-later open-source project management and issue-tracking web application built on Ruby on Rails. It provides flexible issue tracking, role-based access control, Gantt charts and calendars, per-project wikis and forums, time tracking, custom fields, and integration with source-control systems, extended by a broad plugin ecosystem. It is fully self-hosted, database-agnostic, and light enough to run on modest hardware. Redmine is a solid choice for technical teams that want a stable, no-subscription tracker they fully control, and that don't mind a more utilitarian interface and some configuration to reach modern conveniences.

Strengths

  • +Fully GPL-2.0-or-later open-source with no paid tier gating core features
  • +Lightweight and cross-database; runs comfortably on modest hardware, including small VPS or homelab setups
  • +Long track record, very stable, with a large plugin ecosystem and REST API
  • +Self-hosted with your data in a standard SQL database you control

Trade-offs

  • Interface is more utilitarian and dated than Jira or the newer alternatives here
  • Advanced planning (e.g. richer agile boards, portfolio views) often depends on third-party plugins of varying quality
  • Release cadence is steady but slower than fast-moving projects like Plane
  • You handle installation, upgrades, backups, and plugin compatibility yourself
Free / self-host (GPL-2.0-or-later); costs are hosting, maintenance, and optional third-party support only
#4

Taiga

Open-source agile project management with clean Scrum and Kanban boards, self-hostable and free.

88
OPEN SOURCEAGPL-3.0 (frontend, relicensed 2024); MPL-2.0 (backend) — both OSI-approvedSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST 838updated 6 days ago

Taiga is an open-source project management platform focused on agile teams, with Scrum and Kanban boards, backlogs, sprints, epics, issue tracking, and a per-project wiki behind a clean, approachable interface. It is built as a Django/PostgreSQL backend with a separate frontend and is fully self-hostable via Docker, with importers from Jira, Trello, Asana, and others. Note the licensing split: the frontend was relicensed to AGPL-3.0 in 2024 while the backend remains MPL-2.0 — both OSI-approved open-source licenses. Taiga fits teams that want a visually pleasant, agile-first tool they can run themselves without per-seat cost.

Strengths

  • +Fully open-source (AGPL-3.0 frontend, MPL-2.0 backend) and free to self-host with unlimited users and projects
  • +Clean, agile-first UI with Scrum and Kanban boards, backlogs, sprints, epics, and issue tracking
  • +Self-hosted with your data in a PostgreSQL database you control; REST API for integration
  • +Importers from Jira, Trello, Asana, and others help with migration

Trade-offs

  • Multi-service stack (Django, PostgreSQL, Redis, RabbitMQ, Celery) makes self-hosting operationally involved
  • Native SSO options are limited and some setups need plugins or extra configuration
  • Development cadence is steady rather than fast-moving
  • The split frontend/backend licensing is worth understanding if you plan to modify and redistribute it
Free / self-host (open-source); optional paid hosted cloud plans available from Taiga

Questions people ask

Is there a truly free, self-hosted alternative to Jira?

Yes. OpenProject (GPL-3.0 Community Edition), Plane (AGPL-3.0 Community Edition), Redmine (GPL-2.0-or-later), and Taiga (AGPL-3.0 frontend, MPL-2.0 backend) are all open-source project management tools you can run for free on your own server, typically via Docker, with unlimited users and no per-seat pricing. You take on hosting and maintenance in exchange for full control of your data.

Which open-source option is closest to Jira for a whole engineering organization?

OpenProject is generally the closest for a broad, enterprise-style deployment — its free Community Edition includes Gantt scheduling, agile boards, time tracking, cost reporting, and portfolio management for unlimited users. Plane is the strongest pick if you want a modern, lighter agile tool with cycles and roadmaps. Redmine suits technical teams wanting a stable, lightweight tracker, and Taiga is a good fit for agile teams who value a clean Scrum/Kanban experience.

What are the real trade-offs of self-hosting instead of Jira Cloud?

You trade convenience for control. Self-hosting removes per-user subscription cost and keeps data on infrastructure you own, which helps with privacy, compliance, and data residency. In return you take on running servers, applying updates and database migrations, handling backups and SSL, and — for tools like OpenProject, Plane, and Taiga — operating a multi-service stack. Some enterprise features (notably SSO) sit in paid tiers even for the open-source tools. Budget for the operational effort before switching.

When is Jira still the better choice?

If you want zero servers to maintain, deep integration with Confluence, Bitbucket, and Jira Service Management, a huge Marketplace of add-ons, mature SSO and admin controls, and vendor support out of the box, Jira remains a strong, convenient option — especially for teams already invested in the Atlassian ecosystem. The open-source alternatives pay off most when per-seat cost at scale, data control, or avoiding ecosystem lock-in matter more than turnkey convenience.

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-07-07. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.