Cline vs OpenHands
Both are alternatives to Cursor. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as OpenHands vs Cline — same comparison, one verdict.
Cline and OpenHands are closely matched on ownership (92 vs 91) — this one comes down to pricing and to which trade-offs below you can live with.
Cline
TOP PICKThe open-source agent that lives in the editor you already have.
Cline (Apache-2.0, by Cline Bot Inc.) is an autonomous coding agent that installs as a VS Code extension, a JetBrains plugin or a CLI — so you keep your editor, your extensions and your keybindings and simply add the agent. It is model-agnostic: bring your own key for Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Bedrock and 100+ others, or point it at Ollama or LM Studio and run the whole loop on your own machine. Cline sells optional prepaid credits and an enterprise tier, but nothing about the extension requires an account, and with your own key there is no Cline backend in the request path. At roughly 4.81 million VS Code installs and 65.2k GitHub stars it is the most widely adopted open-source coding agent, and because it is published on Open VSX you can also install it inside Cursor itself.
OpenHands
Self-hosted, sandboxed coding agents — the whole stack runs on infrastructure you control.
OpenHands (MIT, formerly OpenDevin) is the option for people whose actual requirement is "this has to run on infrastructure I control." It is a self-hosted control centre for coding agents: a browser-based Agent Canvas plus a backend server you start locally or on your own VM, with agents working inside a sandboxed environment that has its own shell, filesystem and browser. Agents can edit code, run commands, call APIs and browse the web — real engineering tasks rather than completions. The project sells a managed OpenHands Cloud and licenses a self-hosted enterprise edition, but the core is MIT and self-hosting costs nothing beyond your own model usage. At 82.5k stars it is the most established self-hosted agent platform available.
Side by side
6 points of comparison, every one read from a verified field. Green marks the side that wins a row outright. A dash means we do not hold that fact — never that it is zero.
| Cline | OpenHands | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty ScoreOur transparent 0–100 composite for data ownership and exit cost. | 92 | 91 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first data | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Pricing | Free and open source (Apache-2.0) — you pay only your model provider. Optional prepaid Cline credits and a paid enterprise tier exist; bring-your-own-key needs no account. | Free and open source (MIT) to self-host — you pay only your model provider. Managed OpenHands Cloud and a licensed enterprise self-host are the paid tiers. |
Cline is Macrostack's recommended Cursor alternative, so it's our pick here.
Cline
Strengths
- +Keeps your existing IDE, extensions and keybindings — the smallest possible change from Cursor
- +Bring-your-own-key with no account required: 100+ providers, or fully local via Ollama / LM Studio
- +Plan/Act split and diffs you approve before anything is written, plus MCP tool support
- +The most-adopted open agent in the category: ~4.81M VS Code installs, 65.2k stars, commits daily
Trade-offs
- −No inline Tab-style autocomplete — Cline is an agent, not a completion engine, and this is its most-requested missing feature
- −You manage your own API billing; long agent runs on a frontier model can cost more than a $20 Cursor seat
- −Cline's own prepaid-credits path is the promoted onboarding — bring-your-own-key takes a couple of extra settings
- −Running a capable model locally is a real hardware ask (see the hardware note)
OpenHands
Strengths
- +Genuinely self-hosted: server, sandbox and workspace all sit on your own infrastructure
- +Sandboxed execution — the agent gets a container, not unrestricted access to your laptop
- +Browser UI suits longer autonomous runs and reviewing what an agent actually did
- +MIT-licensed, 82.5k stars, committed to daily
Trade-offs
- −The heaviest setup here — Docker and real RAM, not a two-minute install
- −Long autonomous runs consume a lot of tokens; set a budget before you let one loose
- −Multi-user, RBAC and the richer integrations live in the paid Cloud and enterprise tiers
- −Not an in-editor experience — you leave your IDE to drive it, and there's no inline completion
Which one fits you
The trade-offs above, turned into a decision. Find the line that describes your team.
Choose Cline
if a lower exit cost matters more to you than any single feature, and keeps your existing IDE, extensions and keybindings — the smallest possible change from Cursor.
Choose OpenHands
if genuinely self-hosted: server, sandbox and workspace all sit on your own infrastructure.
Neither, yet
if both carry a real cost you should weigh first — no inline Tab-style autocomplete — Cline is an agent, not a completion engine, and this is its most-requested missing feature, and the heaviest setup here — Docker and real RAM, not a two-minute install. If either of those is a dealbreaker for your team, the shortlist is wrong rather than the choice.
Cline vs OpenHands — common questions
Is Cline a better fit than OpenHands for ai coding assistants?
It depends on what you are optimising for, and the honest split is this: Cline scores 92 to OpenHands's 91 on data ownership and exit cost, so it is the safer choice if you care about being able to leave. OpenHands earns its place on a different axis — genuinely self-hosted: server, sandbox and workspace all sit on your own infrastructure. Neither is a wrong answer for every team; the table above is the actual comparison.
What happens if we want to switch later?
Cline keeps its data local or in open formats, so leaving is an export rather than a negotiation. OpenHands is still self-hostable, so the files stay on your server either way — but it is not local-first by design, so check what its export produces before you rely on it.
Can I self-host Cline or OpenHands?
Both can be self-hosted. The difference is what it costs you in time rather than whether it is possible — see the setup and maintenance rows above.
Are Cline and OpenHands both alternatives to Cursor?
Yes — both appear in our Cursor comparison, which is why they are worth putting side by side. People usually arrive here already having decided to move off Cursor and now choosing between the two replacements, which is a narrower and much easier question.
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-07-29. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.