ONLYOFFICE vs CryptPad
Both are free/open-source alternatives to Microsoft 365. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
ONLYOFFICE
Open-source suite with the closest Microsoft-format fidelity and real-time co-editing.
ONLYOFFICE is an open-source office suite whose editors use Office Open XML (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX) as their native formats, which gives it some of the best fidelity with Microsoft files of any alternative here. It comes in two parts: the free ONLYOFFICE Desktop Editors, an offline app for Windows, macOS, and Linux; and ONLYOFFICE Docs (Document Server), a self-hostable engine that adds real-time co-authoring, comments, track changes, and version history in the browser. Both are AGPL-3.0 licensed. It is a strong fit for teams that want Microsoft-like documents plus self-hosted collaboration on infrastructure they control. The vendor also sells hosted cloud and enterprise editions.
CryptPad
End-to-end-encrypted collaborative documents where the server never sees your content.
CryptPad is a privacy-first collaboration suite built around end-to-end encryption: documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and more are encrypted in your browser, so a self-hosted or public server stores only ciphertext and cannot read your content. It supports real-time co-editing, shared folders, and a range of app types, and it is AGPL-3.0 licensed and self-hostable via Docker or a Debian install. Developed by XWiki SAS with public-interest funding, it also runs a free public instance at cryptpad.fr. It is the strongest choice when confidentiality is the priority; the trade-off is that it is a distinct web workspace rather than a drop-in Microsoft-format editor.
Side by side
| ONLYOFFICE | CryptPad | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 97 | 92 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free desktop apps and self-hosted Community server; paid cloud and enterprise editions available | Free / self-host; free public instance at cryptpad.fr |
ONLYOFFICE edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
ONLYOFFICE
Strengths
- +AGPL-3.0 licensed and genuinely open, for both the desktop editors and the Docs server
- +Uses DOCX/XLSX/PPTX as native formats, giving very high fidelity with Microsoft files
- +Self-hostable Docs server adds real-time co-authoring, comments, and track changes on your own infrastructure
- +Free offline desktop apps for Windows, macOS, and Linux for users who do not need collaboration
- +Actively developed with a regular release cadence and integrations for Nextcloud, ownCloud, and others
Trade-offs
- −Real-time collaboration requires running and maintaining the Docs server, which needs a capable server
- −The free self-hosted Community edition is intended for smaller deployments; heavier or enterprise use points to the paid editions
- −Some advanced features and official support sit behind the paid cloud/enterprise tiers
- −As a newer suite, it has a smaller extension ecosystem than the most established desktop suites
CryptPad
Strengths
- +AGPL-3.0 licensed and self-hostable via Docker or Debian, so you can own the whole stack
- +End-to-end encryption means the server stores only encrypted data and cannot read your documents
- +Real-time collaborative documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and shared drives in the browser
- +A free public instance (cryptpad.fr) lets you try it with no setup
- +Actively maintained by XWiki SAS with sustained public-interest funding
Trade-offs
- −It is a browser-based encrypted workspace, not a full desktop suite or a drop-in Microsoft-format editor
- −Compatibility with complex Microsoft documents is more limited than ONLYOFFICE or LibreOffice
- −The encryption model means account recovery and some integrations work differently from conventional suites
- −Self-hosting requires running a server, and encrypted real-time editing is heavier than plain document storage
Facts verified 2026-07-06. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.