Formbricks vs Typebot
Both are alternatives to Typeform. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Typebot vs Formbricks — same comparison, one verdict.
Formbricks
TOP PICKSelf-hosted surveys built for privacy-first teams.
Formbricks is an open survey and experience platform designed to be self-hosted: link surveys, in-app surveys triggered by user behaviour, and website surveys, with responses resting on your own infrastructure. That last point is the reason to choose it — for GDPR-sensitive work, form responses never leaving your servers turns a compliance conversation into a non-event. Around 12.7k stars, actively developed, with a paid cloud for teams who would rather not host. The licence is an open core with some enterprise features commercially licensed, so check which side of the line the feature you need falls on.
Typebot
The conversational format, open source, with real branching.
Typebot is the closest match to what people actually pay Typeform for: conversational forms built on a visual flow canvas, with branching, conditional logic, variables and integrations. Because it is a flow builder rather than a question list, complex branching is easier to construct here than in Typeform. Self-hostable with Docker and available as a paid cloud. It is the pick when the conversational feel is the thing you are buying and you would rather not buy it per response.
Side by side
| Formbricks | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 90 | 91 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | Yes | Yes |
| License | Open core (AGPL-3.0 core; enterprise features commercially licensed) | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free and open source to self-host. Paid cloud and enterprise tiers. | Free and open source to self-host. Paid cloud plans available. |
Formbricks is Macrostack's recommended Typeform alternative, so it's our pick here.
Formbricks
Strengths
- +Responses never leave your infrastructure — the compliance answer
- +In-app and website surveys, not just link forms
- +No per-response pricing; a successful survey costs nothing extra
- +Modern interface and active development
Trade-offs
- −Some enterprise features are commercially licensed
- −You now run a service, with the upgrades and backups that implies
- −Smaller integration catalogue than Typeform
- −Conversational polish is close but not identical
Typebot
Strengths
- +Closest replication of the Typeform conversational experience
- +Flow-canvas builder handles complex branching better than Typeform
- +Variables, conditions and integrations built in
- +Self-hosts on Docker; no per-response charge
Trade-offs
- −AGPL-3.0 strong copyleft — read it before modifying and redistributing
- −Smaller community than Formbricks
- −Fewer templates and prebuilt integrations
- −Self-hosting is your responsibility to run and update
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-07. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.