Formbricks vs Typebot
Both are alternatives to Typeform. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Typebot vs Formbricks — same comparison, one verdict.
Formbricks and Typebot are closely matched on ownership (90 vs 91) — this one comes down to pricing and to which trade-offs below you can live with.
Formbricks
TOP PICKSelf-hosted surveys built for privacy-first teams.
Formbricks is an open survey and experience platform designed to be self-hosted: link surveys, in-app surveys triggered by user behaviour, and website surveys, with responses resting on your own infrastructure. That last point is the reason to choose it — for GDPR-sensitive work, form responses never leaving your servers turns a compliance conversation into a non-event. Around 12.7k stars, actively developed, with a paid cloud for teams who would rather not host. The licence is an open core with some enterprise features commercially licensed, so check which side of the line the feature you need falls on.
Typebot
The conversational format, open source, with real branching.
Typebot is the closest match to what people actually pay Typeform for: conversational forms built on a visual flow canvas, with branching, conditional logic, variables and integrations. Because it is a flow builder rather than a question list, complex branching is easier to construct here than in Typeform. Self-hostable with Docker and available as a paid cloud. It is the pick when the conversational feel is the thing you are buying and you would rather not buy it per response.
Side by side
6 points of comparison, every one read from a verified field. Green marks the side that wins a row outright. A dash means we do not hold that fact — never that it is zero.
| Formbricks | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty ScoreOur transparent 0–100 composite for data ownership and exit cost. | 90 | 91 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first data | Yes | Yes |
| License | Open core (AGPL-3.0 core; enterprise features commercially licensed) | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free and open source to self-host. Paid cloud and enterprise tiers. | Free and open source to self-host. Paid cloud plans available. |
Formbricks is Macrostack's recommended Typeform alternative, so it's our pick here.
Weighing both against staying on Typeform? Is Typeform free? What it actually costs →
Formbricks
Strengths
- +Responses never leave your infrastructure — the compliance answer
- +In-app and website surveys, not just link forms
- +No per-response pricing; a successful survey costs nothing extra
- +Modern interface and active development
Trade-offs
- −Some enterprise features are commercially licensed
- −You now run a service, with the upgrades and backups that implies
- −Smaller integration catalogue than Typeform
- −Conversational polish is close but not identical
Typebot
Strengths
- +Closest replication of the Typeform conversational experience
- +Flow-canvas builder handles complex branching better than Typeform
- +Variables, conditions and integrations built in
- +Self-hosts on Docker; no per-response charge
Trade-offs
- −AGPL-3.0 strong copyleft — read it before modifying and redistributing
- −Smaller community than Formbricks
- −Fewer templates and prebuilt integrations
- −Self-hosting is your responsibility to run and update
Which one fits you
The trade-offs above, turned into a decision. Find the line that describes your team.
Choose Formbricks
if responses never leave your infrastructure — the compliance answer.
Choose Typebot
if a lower exit cost matters more to you than any single feature, and closest replication of the Typeform conversational experience.
Neither, yet
if both carry a real cost you should weigh first — some enterprise features are commercially licensed, and aGPL-3.0 strong copyleft — read it before modifying and redistributing. If either of those is a dealbreaker for your team, the shortlist is wrong rather than the choice.
Formbricks vs Typebot — common questions
Is Formbricks a better fit than Typebot for forms & surveys?
It depends on what you are optimising for, and the honest split is this: Typebot scores 91 to Formbricks's 90 on data ownership and exit cost, so it is the safer choice if you care about being able to leave. Formbricks earns its place on a different axis — responses never leave your infrastructure — the compliance answer. Neither is a wrong answer for every team; the table above is the actual comparison.
What happens if we want to switch later?
Formbricks keeps its data local or in open formats, so leaving is an export rather than a negotiation. Typebot is still self-hostable, so the files stay on your server either way — but it is not local-first by design, so check what its export produces before you rely on it.
Can I self-host Formbricks or Typebot?
Both can be self-hosted. The difference is what it costs you in time rather than whether it is possible — see the setup and maintenance rows above.
Are Formbricks and Typebot both alternatives to Typeform?
Yes — both appear in our Typeform comparison, which is why they are worth putting side by side. People usually arrive here already having decided to move off Typeform and now choosing between the two replacements, which is a narrower and much easier question.
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-07. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.