Jitsi Meet vs Jami
Both are alternatives to Zoom. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Jami vs Jitsi Meet — same comparison, one verdict.
Jitsi Meet
TOP PICKOpen-source video meetings with no account required.
Jitsi Meet is a mature, open-source video-conferencing platform you can use free on the public instance or self-host for full control. Participants can join from a browser with no account, which makes it one of the easiest Zoom replacements to adopt.
Jami
Fully peer-to-peer calls with no server at all.
Jami is a GNU project for calls and messaging that works peer-to-peer and end-to-end encrypted, with no central server to run or trust. It is the most decentralized option — private by design, at the cost of some polish for large group meetings.
Side by side
| Jitsi Meet | Jami | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 92 | 90 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free / open-source (self-host or use a public instance) | Free / open-source |
Jitsi Meet is Macrostack's recommended Zoom alternative, so it's our pick here.
Jitsi Meet
Strengths
- +No account needed to join
- +Self-hostable for full control
- +Mature and widely deployed
Trade-offs
- −Large calls need a well-sized server
- −Advanced features require self-hosting effort
Jami
Strengths
- +Fully peer-to-peer — no server to run
- +End-to-end encrypted by design
- +Cross-platform
Trade-offs
- −Less turnkey for big group meetings
- −Smaller ecosystem than Jitsi
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-07-12. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.