Pinta vs Photopea
Both are alternatives to Adobe Photoshop. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Photopea vs Pinta — same comparison, one verdict.
Pinta is open source (MIT) and Photopea is not (Proprietary (free)) — so the real question is whether you want to own the image editing stack or rent it.
Pinta
A lightweight, open-source editor for quick everyday image edits.
Pinta is a simple, MIT-licensed image editor modeled on Paint.NET, for the large group of people who pay for Photoshop but mostly crop, resize, annotate, and make quick adjustments. It offers layers, a solid set of adjustments and effects, and an interface you can learn in minutes, on Linux, Windows, and macOS. It is deliberately not a professional tool: there is no PSD support and nothing like Photoshop-depth retouching — but if your needs are genuinely simple, it may be all the editor you need.
Photopea
A free Photoshop-style editor that runs instantly in your browser and opens PSD files.
Photopea is a free web-based editor whose interface and shortcuts closely mirror Photoshop's, with the best PSD compatibility of any free tool — it also opens Illustrator, XD, and Sketch files. Despite running in a browser, it processes everything on your device: by its own documentation it uploads none of your files, and a loaded tab keeps working offline. It is the fastest way for a Photoshop user to get real work done at zero cost, but it is not open-source and cannot be self-hosted — the free version is ad-supported, with an optional Premium subscription (about US$5/month) — which its Sovereignty Score honestly reflects.
Side by side
10 points of comparison, every one read from a verified field. Green marks the side that wins a row outright. A dash means we do not hold that fact — never that it is zero.
| Pinta | Photopea | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty ScoreOur transparent 0–100 composite for data ownership and exit cost. | 92 | 45 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Local-first data | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Proprietary (free) |
| Pricing | Free and open-source | Free in the browser (ad-supported); optional Premium about US$5/month |
| RAM to run it wellThe figure that actually matters, not the vendor's minimum. | Depends on your images. Every layer is a full uncompressed canvas at 4 bytes per pixel, so a 24-megapixel photo costs about 96 MB per layer, before undo history | — |
| Realistic running costWhat the box costs each month if you run it yourself. | $0 — it runs on the machine you already own | — |
| Setup timeHonest first-install estimate, not the marketing quickstart. | 5 minutes | — |
| Ongoing maintenanceThe part nobody budgets for. | Install new versions when they ship, which is a few times a year (3.0.4 through 3.1.2 in the last twelve months). No account, no server, nothing to back up but your own files. | — |
Pinta edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
Weighing both against staying on Adobe Photoshop? Is Adobe Photoshop free? What it actually costs →
Pinta
Strengths
- +Simple and fast for everyday edits — crop, resize, annotate, adjust
- +MIT-licensed and cross-platform (Linux, Windows, macOS)
- +Layers and useful adjustments/effects without a learning curve
- +Small footprint; runs well on older hardware
Trade-offs
- −Nowhere near Photoshop's depth — no advanced retouching, masking, or prepress tools
- −No PSD support (native format plus OpenRaster and standard image formats)
- −Small maintainer team and a modest development pace
- −Far smaller ecosystem and fewer tutorials than GIMP or Krita
Photopea
Strengths
- +Closest free match to Photoshop's interface and shortcuts — minimal relearning
- +Best-in-class PSD compatibility among free tools; also opens AI, XD, and Sketch files
- +Nothing to install; files are processed on your device, not uploaded to a server
- +Works on any OS with a modern browser, including Chromebooks and tablets
Trade-offs
- −Not open-source and not self-hostable — you depend on Photopea.com remaining available
- −Free version is ad-supported
- −Very large or complex documents are constrained by browser memory
- −Offline use works in an already-loaded tab, but it is not an installable local app you control
Which one fits you
The trade-offs above, turned into a decision. Find the line that describes your team.
Choose Pinta
if you want the source and the option to fork it, and you would rather run it on your own hardware, and simple and fast for everyday edits — crop, resize, annotate, adjust.
Choose Photopea
if closest free match to Photoshop's interface and shortcuts — minimal relearning.
Neither, yet
if both carry a real cost you should weigh first — nowhere near Photoshop's depth — no advanced retouching, masking, or prepress tools, and not open-source and not self-hostable — you depend on Photopea.com remaining available. If either of those is a dealbreaker for your team, the shortlist is wrong rather than the choice.
What it takes to run these yourself
Real requirements and honest running costs, not the vendor quickstart.
Pinta vs Photopea — common questions
Is Pinta a better fit than Photopea for image editing?
It depends on what you are optimising for, and the honest split is this: Pinta scores 92 to Photopea's 45 on data ownership and exit cost, so it is the safer choice if you care about being able to leave. Photopea earns its place on a different axis — closest free match to Photoshop's interface and shortcuts — minimal relearning. Neither is a wrong answer for every team; the table above is the actual comparison.
What happens if we want to switch later?
Pinta keeps its data local or in open formats, so leaving is an export rather than a negotiation. Photopea keeps your data on its own infrastructure, which is the part to plan for: confirm the export path before you commit, not when you are already trying to leave.
Can I self-host Pinta?
Pinta can be self-hosted; Photopea cannot, so it stays on the vendor's infrastructure whatever you do.
Are Pinta and Photopea both alternatives to Adobe Photoshop?
Yes — both appear in our Adobe Photoshop comparison, which is why they are worth putting side by side. People usually arrive here already having decided to move off Adobe Photoshop and now choosing between the two replacements, which is a narrower and much easier question.
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-07-06. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.