macrostack

serverless inference · api · Layer 2.5

Replicate

Product teams shipping a model-backed feature who do not want to think about GPUs at all.

low portability Sticky. Leaving means rewriting against a different interface, not changing a hostname.

What you are buying

Business model
You never see a GPU. You send a request and pay per token or per second of execution.
How you reach it
You call an endpoint. There is no infrastructure to see, and no infrastructure to move.
Accelerators
A100, H100, L40S, T4 behind hosted models
Regions
US
Pricing model
Per second of prediction time, per hardware class.
Getting started
API key.
Capacity
Managed.
Ownership
Private.

Verified 2026-09-09. Fields reading “not published” are exactly that — we do not estimate a figure a vendor withholds.

The counterparty

Low. Models are containerised with an open packaging format, so the exit is unusually clean for this layer.

A multi-year GPU commitment is a credit decision wearing a cloud contract. This is the section no benchmark covers and the one that decides what happens to your workload in 2028.

The catch

Cold starts on unpopular models are long. The convenience premium over renting the same GPU directly is large and worth calculating once.

The economics

The most expensive way to buy a GPU-second and often the cheapest way to ship a feature. Both are true; which one matters depends on your volume.

No rate is quoted on this page on purpose. Published list prices at this layer move weekly and essentially nobody signing a real contract pays them. Dated, sourced figures live in the GPU cost calculator, where the cheapest and dearest published on-demand price for the identical H100 sit 5.6× apart.

The layers underneath this one

Whatever you rent here is a chip in a building that needs power. In 2026 megawatts, not silicon, are the binding constraint on the whole industry — a frontier rack draws 120–200 kW against a 2026 average near 27 kW, and the US interconnection queue exceeds 2,600 GW.

Layer 2 — Silicon · Layer 1 — Energy · The interconnection queue · Tokens per watt

Compared against

  • Replicate vs Modal — Ship a feature in an afternoon, or own the deployment model.Compare with Modal

Related providers

Sources

Macrostack does not benchmark clusters and does not pretend to. For hands-on performance ratings of GPU clouds, SemiAnalysis’s ClusterMAX tests the hardware directly. This page covers what their scorecard does not: who owns the company and how you get out.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.