macrostack

Layer 1 · Where the power comes from

Demand response and curtailable load

Operators who can genuinely pause or shift work, which for training is more plausible than it sounds.

The shape of it

Lead time
Months
Capital cost
Low — it is mostly contractual and operational
Carbon
Neutral to positive
Maturity
proven

Verified 2026-09-09.

The catch

Requires workloads that tolerate interruption. Inference serving real users does not. Training checkpoints do.

What it actually decides

Increasingly the price of getting connected at all — several utilities now favour flexible loads in the queue. The cheapest megawatt is the one you agree not to draw at peak.

What this is powering

A GB200 NVL72 rack draws 120–132 kW and a GB300 pushes 135–200 kW, against a 2026 average rack of about 27 kW. The silicon decision and the power decision are the same decision, made eighteen months apart.

Layer 2 — Silicon · GB200 NVL72 · The 150 W inference option

Weighed against

Others in where the power comes from

Want this whole layer as one table?

The power and cooling options on these pages as a single CSV — lead time, capex, carbon, maturity, density supported, PUE, the catch and what each one decides — ready to sort, filter or load into a notebook.

Get the energy table — free for research and evaluation

Four short lines and the download starts at once (CC-BY-NC-4.0, built from these pages the moment you ask). What you type is used only to answer the request and is never sold. Prefer Hugging Face? Request it there.

Using it inside a product, a client report or anything you sell? That needs a commercial licence.

Macrostack sells nothing at this layer and takes no commission on any option here. That is precisely why this comparison did not exist — everyone qualified to write it sells one of the answers.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.