</>macrostackBrowse all
Migration guide · Authentication & Identity

The 5 best Auth0 alternatives

Auth0 is a hosted authentication-and-authorization platform (Customer Identity and Access Management, or CIAM) owned by Okta. It provides Universal Login, social and enterprise SSO connections, multi-factor authentication, role-based access control, and machine-to-machine token issuance through SDKs for most major frameworks, so developers can add secure login to an app without building an identity system from scratch.

90
Bottom line

Keycloak is our top pick — The mature, CNCF-backed open-source identity and access management server. We compare all 5 options below, with honest trade-offs.

Jump to the full comparison →

The cost

Free plan covers up to 25,000 monthly active users (MAUs) with core login features, 1 Enterprise Connection, and 5 Organizations. Paid B2C plans start at Essentials ($35/month for 500 MAUs, scaling with usage) and Professional ($240/month for 500 MAUs); B2B plans start substantially higher — Essentials at $150/month and Professional at $800/month — because they meter Enterprise SSO connections and Organizations more aggressively. Enterprise tiers are quote-based. Verified directly against auth0.com/pricing, July 2026.

Why people consider an alternative

Teams typically look for an alternative when MAU-based or per-connection billing becomes hard to predict as an app grows, when a needed feature (custom domains beyond the basics, richer MFA, longer log retention, more Organizations) sits one tier up from where they are, when they need full control over where identity data physically lives (data residency, air-gapped, or regulated environments), or when they simply want to stop depending on a third-party service for something as foundational as login.

When Auth0 is still the right call

If your team doesn't want to run or patch an identity server, or you need Auth0/Okta's compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA BAAs, ISO 27001) and enterprise support SLAs out of the box, the managed service is genuinely the right call — self-hosting authentication is one of the few places where an operational mistake (a misconfigured SSO connection, an unpatched CVE) has outsized security consequences, and Auth0's team absorbs that risk for you.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
KeycloakApache-2.0YesFree / self-host (Docker image or standalone distribution); commercial support available via Red Hat build of Keycloak (RHBK) for enterprises that want a support contract.90
authentikMIT (core); authentik/enterprise/ subdirectory carries its own separate license for paid enterprise featuresYesFree / self-host for the core MIT-licensed product; a hosted 'authentik Security' cloud offering and an Enterprise tier (support SLA, extra features under the separate enterprise/ license) are available paid.85
Ory KratosApache-2.0YesFree / self-host under Apache-2.0; Ory Network offers a managed hosted version with a free tier and paid usage-based plans for teams that prefer not to operate it themselves.84
ZITADELAGPL-3.0YesFree / self-host under AGPL-3.0; ZITADEL Cloud offers a managed free tier plus paid usage-based plans for teams that don't want to run the server themselves.82
SuperTokensApache-2.0 (core); ee/ subdirectory carries its own separate license for paid enterprise featuresYesFree / self-host for the Apache-2.0 core; a managed SuperTokens cloud and a paid Enterprise tier (SSO/SAML, advanced MFA policies under the ee/ license) are available for teams that want those features or don't want to self-host.80
90
Macrostack's top pick

Keycloak

The mature, CNCF-backed open-source identity and access management server.

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

Keycloak

The mature, CNCF-backed open-source identity and access management server.

90
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Keycloak is a full-featured IAM server originally built by Red Bull's security team and now a CNCF Incubating project. It supports OIDC, OAuth2, and SAML, social and enterprise identity brokering, fine-grained authorization, and a built-in admin console, and it's the most widely deployed self-hosted alternative to Auth0/Okta in production today.

Strengths

  • +Apache-2.0, fully open-source, no feature gating between a 'community' and 'enterprise' edition
  • +Extremely mature — 10+ years in production at large scale, CNCF Incubating project with active governance
  • +Broad protocol support (OIDC, SAML, OAuth2) and identity brokering to external IdPs out of the box
  • +Large ecosystem of themes, extensions, and Kubernetes operators for production deployment

Trade-offs

  • Runs on the JVM — heavier resource footprint than lightweight Go-based alternatives, and the admin console/config model has a real learning curve
  • You own uptime, patching, and database backups for something security-critical — a genuine operational responsibility Auth0 absorbs for you
  • Theming the login UI to match a product's brand takes more custom work than Auth0's Universal Login customization
Free / self-host (Docker image or standalone distribution); commercial support available via Red Hat build of Keycloak (RHBK) for enterprises that want a support contract.
#2

authentik

A modern, self-hostable identity provider with a flexible visual flow builder.

85
OPEN SOURCEMIT (core); authentik/enterprise/ subdirectory carries its own separate license for paid enterprise featuresSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

authentik is a self-hosted identity provider built around a visual 'flow' system that lets you customize login, enrollment, and recovery steps without deep protocol expertise. It supports OIDC, SAML, LDAP, SCIM, and social login, and ships as a straightforward Docker Compose or Helm deployment aimed at teams who want Keycloak-class capability with a friendlier setup experience.

Strengths

  • +Genuinely MIT-licensed for the core product — no AGPL copyleft concerns for embedding or forking
  • +Visual flow builder makes multi-step login/enrollment/recovery customization far more approachable than editing raw protocol config
  • +Good out-of-box support for LDAP and SCIM alongside OIDC/SAML, useful for bridging older enterprise directories
  • +Active, fast-moving project with frequent releases

Trade-offs

  • The enterprise/ directory ships under authentik's own separate license, not MIT — some advanced features are gated behind the paid tier even when self-hosting the core
  • Younger and smaller community than Keycloak, so fewer third-party guides and Stack Overflow answers exist for edge cases
  • Flow builder flexibility means misconfiguration is possible; production hardening still requires real identity-ops knowledge
Free / self-host for the core MIT-licensed product; a hosted 'authentik Security' cloud offering and an Enterprise tier (support SLA, extra features under the separate enterprise/ license) are available paid.
#3

Ory Kratos

A headless, API-only identity server for teams that want to build their own login UI.

84
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Ory Kratos is a headless identity and user-management server — it handles registration, login, MFA, account recovery, and profile management entirely through APIs, with no bundled UI. It's designed for teams who want full control over the login experience and are comfortable building their own frontend against a well-documented identity API.

Strengths

  • +Clean Apache-2.0 license with no enterprise-only carve-out directory, unlike several peers
  • +Headless-by-design means zero UI lock-in — build exactly the login experience your product needs
  • +Pairs well with companion Ory projects (Hydra for OAuth2/OIDC server, Keto for permissions) for teams that need the full stack
  • +Strong documentation and a security-first design philosophy from the Ory team

Trade-offs

  • Headless-only means you must build and maintain your own login/registration UI — meaningfully more upfront engineering work than Auth0's Universal Login or authentik's flow builder
  • Running the full picture (Kratos + Hydra + Keto) for OAuth2/OIDC server capability adds operational complexity beyond a single service
  • Smaller ecosystem of ready-made UI kits/themes compared to Keycloak or authentik
Free / self-host under Apache-2.0; Ory Network offers a managed hosted version with a free tier and paid usage-based plans for teams that prefer not to operate it themselves.
#4

ZITADEL

A cloud-native, API-first identity platform with a generous self-hosted core.

82
OPEN SOURCEAGPL-3.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

ZITADEL is a modern identity and access management platform built API-first for cloud-native and multi-tenant SaaS use cases. It supports OIDC, SAML, passkeys/WebAuthn, and fine-grained actions/hooks for customizing the auth flow in code, and offers both a managed cloud and a self-hostable core.

Strengths

  • +Strong native support for passkeys/WebAuthn and modern passwordless flows out of the box
  • +API-first design and 'Actions' hooks make custom auth logic (e.g. custom claims, external calls during login) straightforward without forking the codebase
  • +Built for multi-tenancy (organizations/projects) from the ground up, closer to Auth0's B2B model than most self-hosted options
  • +Active development with frequent releases and a responsive open-source community

Trade-offs

  • AGPL-3.0 requires that any modified version offered as a network service also be released under AGPL — a real legal consideration for SaaS companies embedding it
  • Younger project than Keycloak with a smaller track record at very large scale
  • Some advanced features are positioned toward the paid ZITADEL Cloud tier rather than the self-hosted core
Free / self-host under AGPL-3.0; ZITADEL Cloud offers a managed free tier plus paid usage-based plans for teams that don't want to run the server themselves.
#5

SuperTokens

A developer-friendly, self-hostable auth core built for fast integration into existing apps.

80
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0 (core); ee/ subdirectory carries its own separate license for paid enterprise featuresSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

SuperTokens is an authentication solution built to drop into an existing app quickly, with official SDKs for popular frontend and backend frameworks and pre-built session-management, MFA, and passwordless flows. It ships a self-hostable core service plus a managed cloud option, aimed at teams that want Auth0-like integration speed without the recurring per-MAU cost.

Strengths

  • +Genuinely permissive Apache-2.0 core license for self-hosting the base authentication service
  • +SDK-first design with strong framework coverage makes initial integration noticeably faster than headless-only alternatives
  • +Built-in session-management primitives (rotating refresh tokens, anti-CSRF) are handled for you rather than left to the integrator
  • +Free self-hosted core has no MAU cap, unlike Auth0's metered model

Trade-offs

  • Enterprise SSO/SAML and some advanced MFA policies live behind the separately-licensed ee/ directory, not the free core — verify feature-tier fit before committing
  • Smaller community and third-party plugin ecosystem than Keycloak
  • Fewer built-in identity-brokering options (LDAP, legacy enterprise directories) than Keycloak or authentik out of the box
Free / self-host for the Apache-2.0 core; a managed SuperTokens cloud and a paid Enterprise tier (SSO/SAML, advanced MFA policies under the ee/ license) are available for teams that want those features or don't want to self-host.

Questions people ask

Is there a fully open-source alternative to Auth0 with no per-MAU cost?

Yes — Keycloak, authentik, ZITADEL, Ory Kratos, and SuperTokens are all free to self-host with no monthly-active-user billing; you pay only for the infrastructure you run them on. Some (authentik, SuperTokens, ZITADEL Cloud) offer optional paid tiers for enterprise features or managed hosting, but the core self-hosted service is free.

Which Auth0 alternative is closest to a drop-in replacement with the least engineering work?

authentik and Keycloak both bundle a ready-to-use login UI you can theme, closer to Auth0's Universal Login experience than a headless option. Ory Kratos and, to a lesser extent, SuperTokens require building more of your own frontend, which trades upfront work for full control over the login flow.

Do any of these alternatives support B2B features like Auth0's Organizations and Enterprise Connections?

ZITADEL was built API-first around multi-tenant organizations/projects and is the closest match for B2B SaaS patterns. Keycloak supports multiple realms and identity brokering to enterprise IdPs (SAML/LDAP) but models multi-tenancy less natively than ZITADEL. authentik and SuperTokens support enterprise SSO but gate some of it behind their respective paid enterprise tiers.

Why does self-hosting authentication carry more risk than self-hosting, say, a note-taking app?

Authentication is the front door to every other system your users touch — a misconfigured SSO connection, an unpatched CVE, or a missed security update has outsized consequences compared to most self-hosted tools. If your team lacks the operational discipline to patch promptly and monitor closely, staying on a managed service like Auth0 is a legitimate, defensible choice, not a failure to 'do it yourself.'

Compare them head-to-head

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-07-14. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.