Ory Kratos vs SuperTokens
Both are alternatives to Auth0. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as SuperTokens vs Ory Kratos — same comparison, one verdict.
Ory Kratos
A headless, API-only identity server for teams that want to build their own login UI.
Ory Kratos is a headless identity and user-management server — it handles registration, login, MFA, account recovery, and profile management entirely through APIs, with no bundled UI. It's designed for teams who want full control over the login experience and are comfortable building their own frontend against a well-documented identity API.
SuperTokens
A developer-friendly, self-hostable auth core built for fast integration into existing apps.
SuperTokens is an authentication solution built to drop into an existing app quickly, with official SDKs for popular frontend and backend frameworks and pre-built session-management, MFA, and passwordless flows. It ships a self-hostable core service plus a managed cloud option, aimed at teams that want Auth0-like integration speed without the recurring per-MAU cost.
Side by side
| Ory Kratos | SuperTokens | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 84 | 80 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (core); ee/ subdirectory carries its own separate license for paid enterprise features |
| Pricing | Free / self-host under Apache-2.0; Ory Network offers a managed hosted version with a free tier and paid usage-based plans for teams that prefer not to operate it themselves. | Free / self-host for the Apache-2.0 core; a managed SuperTokens cloud and a paid Enterprise tier (SSO/SAML, advanced MFA policies under the ee/ license) are available for teams that want those features or don't want to self-host. |
Ory Kratos edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
Ory Kratos
Strengths
- +Clean Apache-2.0 license with no enterprise-only carve-out directory, unlike several peers
- +Headless-by-design means zero UI lock-in — build exactly the login experience your product needs
- +Pairs well with companion Ory projects (Hydra for OAuth2/OIDC server, Keto for permissions) for teams that need the full stack
- +Strong documentation and a security-first design philosophy from the Ory team
Trade-offs
- −Headless-only means you must build and maintain your own login/registration UI — meaningfully more upfront engineering work than Auth0's Universal Login or authentik's flow builder
- −Running the full picture (Kratos + Hydra + Keto) for OAuth2/OIDC server capability adds operational complexity beyond a single service
- −Smaller ecosystem of ready-made UI kits/themes compared to Keycloak or authentik
SuperTokens
Strengths
- +Genuinely permissive Apache-2.0 core license for self-hosting the base authentication service
- +SDK-first design with strong framework coverage makes initial integration noticeably faster than headless-only alternatives
- +Built-in session-management primitives (rotating refresh tokens, anti-CSRF) are handled for you rather than left to the integrator
- +Free self-hosted core has no MAU cap, unlike Auth0's metered model
Trade-offs
- −Enterprise SSO/SAML and some advanced MFA policies live behind the separately-licensed ee/ directory, not the free core — verify feature-tier fit before committing
- −Smaller community and third-party plugin ecosystem than Keycloak
- −Fewer built-in identity-brokering options (LDAP, legacy enterprise directories) than Keycloak or authentik out of the box
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-07-14. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.