macrostack
Migration guide · Identity & access management

The 5 best Okta alternatives

Okta is the identity layer most large companies standardise on: single sign-on across hundreds of applications, multi-factor authentication, lifecycle management that provisions and de-provisions accounts as people join and leave, and a directory that becomes the system of record for who works here. Auth0, which it acquired, covers the developer-facing side of the same problem.

93
Bottom line

Keycloak is the honest answer for anyone with the platform capability to run it — Apache-2.0, Red Hat-backed, genuinely enterprise-grade. Authentik if you want something markedly easier to operate. Neither is a weekend project, and identity is the wrong place to learn.

Jump to the full comparison →

The cost

Priced per monthly active user, per product, with most features sold separately: single sign-on around $2/user/month, MFA around $3, lifecycle management around $4, and API access management on top. A mid-sized company assembling the pieces it actually needs typically lands between $6 and $11 per user per month, with annual minimums. Figures checked 2026-08-03; identity pricing is heavily negotiated, so treat these as a starting point.

Why people consider an alternative

Cost that compounds twice — per user and per feature. The pricing model means the bill grows when you hire and again when you turn something on, and MFA in particular feels like a strange thing to buy separately in 2026. The second reason is that Keycloak became genuinely enterprise-grade: it is Apache-2.0, backed by Red Hat, and runs identity for very large organisations. The third is sovereignty in the literal sense — your entire employee directory sitting in a US vendor is a live question for European and regulated buyers.

When Okta is still the right call

Stay if identity is genuinely business-critical and you want somebody contractually responsible when SSO breaks at 9am. Stay for the integration catalogue — thousands of pre-built application connections that you would otherwise configure by hand. Stay if you need the compliance envelope: FedRAMP, audit tooling and the paperwork enterprise procurement demands. And stay if you do not have a platform team, because self-hosted identity is the least forgiving thing to run badly.

AlternativeLicenseSelf-hostPricingSovereignty
KeycloakApache-2.0YesFree and open source. Red Hat build with commercial support available.93
Ory KratosApache-2.0YesFree and open source. Ory Network is a paid hosted option.92
ZITADELAGPL-3.0 (open core; paid cloud and enterprise tiers)YesFree and self-hostable. ZITADEL Cloud is paid per active user.88
LogtoMPL-2.0 (open core; paid cloud tier)YesFree and self-hostable. Logto Cloud is paid with a free tier.87
authentikMIT core, with enterprise and documentation carve-outsYesFree and self-hostable for the open core. Enterprise tier is commercial.85
93
Macrostack's top pick

Keycloak

Apache-2.0 identity, backed by Red Hat, running at enterprise scale.

Which one fits your situation?

There is no single best answer — it depends on what you are actually trying to do.

Just tell me the best Okta alternative

Keycloak93

Our top pick — the highest Sovereignty Score at 93, and the one we would choose ourselves.

Keycloak vs Ory Kratos

I want to self-host it and own the data

Ory Kratos92

Self-hostable, so your data stays on your own server. Free and open source. Ory Network is a paid hosted option.

Ory Kratos vs Keycloak

It is just me — I do not want to run a server

ZITADEL88

Offers a hosted option, so you can start without infrastructure. Free and self-hostable. ZITADEL Cloud is paid per active user.

ZITADEL vs Keycloak

Every alternative, compared

#1★ TOP PICK

Keycloak

Apache-2.0 identity, backed by Red Hat, running at enterprise scale.

93
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Keycloak is the serious open answer to Okta: OpenID Connect, SAML, OAuth2, user federation to LDAP and Active Directory, fine-grained authorisation, MFA and an admin console that covers all of it. It is Apache-2.0, sponsored by Red Hat, a CNCF incubating project, and it already runs identity for organisations far larger than yours. Around 36k stars. Nothing about it is a compromise on capability — the cost is entirely in operating it, and identity is the service where operating it badly hurts most.

Strengths

  • +Apache-2.0 with Red Hat behind it and CNCF governance
  • +Genuinely enterprise-grade — SAML, OIDC, LDAP federation, fine-grained authz
  • +No per-user cost, so growth does not raise the bill
  • +Commercial support available if you need someone accountable

Trade-offs

  • Operating it well is a real skill — clustering, upgrades, database tuning
  • Admin console is powerful and not friendly
  • No pre-built integration catalogue on Okta's scale
  • Major version upgrades have broken things historically
Free and open source. Red Hat build with commercial support available.
#2

Ory Kratos

Identity as an API — no UI, no opinions, entirely yours.

92
OPEN SOURCEApache-2.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Ory takes the opposite approach to everything else here: Kratos handles identity, Hydra handles OAuth2, Keto handles permissions, and none of them ship a login screen. You build the interface; they provide the correctness. For a team that wants authentication fully inside their own product with no vendor's branding or flow, that is exactly right, and Apache-2.0 means no licence surprises. For a team that wanted SSO configured by Friday, it is the wrong tool — you are assembling identity from parts.

Strengths

  • +Apache-2.0 across the whole stack — no carve-outs
  • +API-first: your product owns the entire login experience
  • +Cloud-native, stateless, scales horizontally without ceremony
  • +Security-first design with a strong track record

Trade-offs

  • No UI at all — you build every screen
  • Composed of several services to deploy and understand
  • Most engineering effort of anything on this page
  • No admin console for non-technical staff
Free and open source. Ory Network is a paid hosted option.
#3

ZITADEL

Multi-tenant identity built for products, not just employees.

88
OPEN SOURCEAGPL-3.0 (open core; paid cloud and enterprise tiers)SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

ZITADEL is aimed at a different job: identity for your customers rather than your staff. It is multi-tenant by design, so a SaaS company can give each customer organisation its own users, branding and policies without running separate deployments. Event-sourced audit trail, passwordless and OIDC/SAML support, AGPL-3.0, around 15k stars, Swiss-based — which matters to buyers who care where the directory lives. If you are choosing an Auth0 replacement rather than an Okta replacement, this is the closest fit.

Strengths

  • +Multi-tenant by design — the right shape for customer identity
  • +Event-sourced, so the audit trail is complete by construction
  • +Swiss company and hosting, which answers a real procurement question
  • +Modern passwordless and OIDC support

Trade-offs

  • Aimed at customer identity; weaker for internal employee SSO
  • AGPL-3.0 copyleft needs reading
  • Smaller ecosystem than Keycloak
  • Some features reserved for the paid tiers
Free and self-hostable. ZITADEL Cloud is paid per active user.
#4

Logto

The fastest route from nothing to working sign-in.

87
OPEN SOURCEMPL-2.0 (open core; paid cloud tier)SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Logto is the pragmatic middle: pre-built sign-in UI, SDKs for the common frameworks, social logins, MFA and multi-tenancy, deployable with Docker in well under an hour. It is aimed squarely at product teams who need authentication to work this week rather than an identity platform to administer for a decade. MPL-2.0 with a paid cloud tier. It is the smallest and youngest option here, which is the honest caveat, but for a startup replacing Auth0 it removes the most friction.

Strengths

  • +Fastest of these from zero to a working sign-in flow
  • +Sign-in UI included — no screens to build
  • +Good SDKs for React, Next.js, Vue and the mobile frameworks
  • +MPL-2.0 is permissive and easy to reason about

Trade-offs

  • Youngest and smallest project on this page
  • Not built for employee SSO across hundreds of apps
  • Fewer enterprise features than Keycloak
  • Multi-tenancy is newer and less proven than ZITADEL's
Free and self-hostable. Logto Cloud is paid with a free tier.
#5

authentik

Modern identity that a small team can actually operate.

85
OPEN SOURCEMIT core, with enterprise and documentation carve-outsSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

authentik was built on the premise that Keycloak is more than most companies need and harder than most can run. It covers SSO, MFA, SAML, OIDC, LDAP outposts and a genuinely good flow builder for custom login journeys, with a clean interface and a Docker Compose deployment. Around 23k stars. The licence is worth stating precisely: the core is MIT, the `website/` directory is CC BY-SA, and enterprise features sit under a separate commercial licence — so it is MIT-with-carve-outs rather than plainly MIT.

Strengths

  • +By far the easiest of these to stand up and keep running
  • +Flow builder makes custom login journeys genuinely configurable
  • +Modern interface a small team can navigate without training
  • +Docker Compose deployment; sensible defaults

Trade-offs

  • Enterprise features are carved out of the MIT core
  • Younger and smaller than Keycloak
  • Single-vendor governance rather than a foundation
  • Fewer third-party integrations
Free and self-hostable for the open core. Enterprise tier is commercial.

Questions people ask

How much does Okta cost?

It is priced per monthly active user and per product — single sign-on around $2, MFA around $3, lifecycle management around $4, each separately. Assembling what a mid-sized company actually needs usually lands between $6 and $11 per user per month with annual minimums. The bill grows both when you hire and when you enable another feature.

Is Keycloak really enterprise-ready?

Yes. It is Apache-2.0, sponsored by Red Hat, a CNCF incubating project, and already runs identity for organisations considerably larger than most companies evaluating it. The gap is not capability, it is operations: clustering, upgrades and database tuning are real work, and identity is the worst service to run badly.

What should I use instead of Auth0?

ZITADEL if you need multi-tenant customer identity, which is the shape most Auth0 users actually have. Logto if the priority is a working sign-in flow this week with the UI included. Ory Kratos if you want your product to own every screen and are willing to build them.

Compare them head-to-head

Related comparisons

Entry last verified 2026-08-03. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.