Logto vs authentik
Both are alternatives to Okta. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as authentik vs Logto — same comparison, one verdict.
Logto
The fastest route from nothing to working sign-in.
Logto is the pragmatic middle: pre-built sign-in UI, SDKs for the common frameworks, social logins, MFA and multi-tenancy, deployable with Docker in well under an hour. It is aimed squarely at product teams who need authentication to work this week rather than an identity platform to administer for a decade. MPL-2.0 with a paid cloud tier. It is the smallest and youngest option here, which is the honest caveat, but for a startup replacing Auth0 it removes the most friction.
authentik
Modern identity that a small team can actually operate.
authentik was built on the premise that Keycloak is more than most companies need and harder than most can run. It covers SSO, MFA, SAML, OIDC, LDAP outposts and a genuinely good flow builder for custom login journeys, with a clean interface and a Docker Compose deployment. Around 23k stars. The licence is worth stating precisely: the core is MIT, the `website/` directory is CC BY-SA, and enterprise features sit under a separate commercial licence — so it is MIT-with-carve-outs rather than plainly MIT.
Side by side
| Logto | authentik | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 87 | 85 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | Yes | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 (open core; paid cloud tier) | MIT core, with enterprise and documentation carve-outs |
| Pricing | Free and self-hostable. Logto Cloud is paid with a free tier. | Free and self-hostable for the open core. Enterprise tier is commercial. |
Logto edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
Logto
Strengths
- +Fastest of these from zero to a working sign-in flow
- +Sign-in UI included — no screens to build
- +Good SDKs for React, Next.js, Vue and the mobile frameworks
- +MPL-2.0 is permissive and easy to reason about
Trade-offs
- −Youngest and smallest project on this page
- −Not built for employee SSO across hundreds of apps
- −Fewer enterprise features than Keycloak
- −Multi-tenancy is newer and less proven than ZITADEL's
authentik
Strengths
- +By far the easiest of these to stand up and keep running
- +Flow builder makes custom login journeys genuinely configurable
- +Modern interface a small team can navigate without training
- +Docker Compose deployment; sensible defaults
Trade-offs
- −Enterprise features are carved out of the MIT core
- −Younger and smaller than Keycloak
- −Single-vendor governance rather than a foundation
- −Fewer third-party integrations
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-03. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.