Uptime Kuma vs Instatus
Both are alternatives to Atlassian Statuspage. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Instatus vs Uptime Kuma — same comparison, one verdict.
Uptime Kuma
TOP PICKThe self-hosted monitor that beat the paid ones on features.
Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that does, for free and on your own server, most of what the paid services charge monthly for: HTTP, TCP, ping, DNS and keyword checks, 60-second intervals, a genuinely good dashboard, public status pages, and notifications to more than ninety services including Slack, Discord, Telegram, email and webhooks. It runs as one Docker container on hardware you already have. At roughly 89.7k GitHub stars it is one of the most-starred self-hosted projects in existence, and that popularity is deserved rather than fashionable — the free tiers of the commercial services are more limited than this is. MIT licensed, pushed to daily.
Instatus
A fast, cheap status page that does the one job well.
Instatus is a focused competitor to Statuspage: fast pages, unlimited subscribers on paid plans rather than metered ones, custom domains, and a free tier that is genuinely usable. It is proprietary and hosted, and it is here because subscriber-metered pricing is the specific complaint that sends people looking, and Instatus's answer to it is to not meter subscribers. For a team that wants a customer-facing status page and does not want to self-host one, it is usually the cheaper straight swap.
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Instatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 96 | 44 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Local-first | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Proprietary (hosted service) |
| Pricing | Free and open source. One Docker container on a server you already run. | Free tier with a usable feature set; paid plans are a flat monthly fee rather than per-subscriber. Checked 2026-08-01. |
Uptime Kuma is Macrostack's recommended Atlassian Statuspage alternative, so it's our pick here.
Uptime Kuma
Strengths
- +60-second checks and unlimited monitors with no plan to upgrade to
- +Public status pages included rather than sold separately
- +Notifications to 90+ services out of the box
- +MIT, one container, and the most-starred tool in the category
Trade-offs
- −It runs on your infrastructure — so it cannot tell you your infrastructure is down
- −Single-node by design; no multi-region checking
- −You own updates, backups and the uptime of the uptime monitor
- −No phone-call escalation or on-call rotation
Instatus
Strengths
- +Does not meter subscribers, which is Statuspage's sharpest cost edge
- +Very fast pages and a clean, modern design
- +Custom domains available on low tiers
- +Straight swap — migration is mostly re-entering components
Trade-offs
- −Proprietary and hosted; no self-host path
- −Smaller company than Atlassian, which matters to some procurement teams
- −Fewer integrations than Statuspage
- −Still a second tool if you already run Uptime Kuma
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-01. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.