Statping-ng vs UptimeRobot
Both are alternatives to Atlassian Statuspage. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as UptimeRobot vs Statping-ng — same comparison, one verdict.
Statping-ng
A self-hosted status page in one binary — but check the commit dates.
Statping-ng is the community continuation of Statping: a single Go binary that monitors services and renders a public status page, with no database server required for small deployments. GPL-3.0, and the design is genuinely nice. The reason it is ranked where it is rather than higher is a fact worth stating plainly: its last push was 2025-06-04, more than a year ago. That is not automatically disqualifying for a small, feature-complete tool, but unmaintained software that faces the public internet is a security decision rather than a convenience one, and anyone choosing it should do so knowingly.
UptimeRobot
Hosted checks from outside your network, with a free tier that is actually usable.
UptimeRobot is the hosted answer, and it solves the one problem no self-hosted monitor can: it watches your site from outside your own infrastructure, so when your server, your network or your data centre goes down, the thing telling you about it is not also down. The free tier is unusually generous — 50 monitors at 5-minute intervals, email alerts and a public status page — which is more than enough for most personal sites and small businesses. Paid plans add 30-second checks, SMS and voice alerts, and multi-location verification to cut false alarms. It is proprietary and hosted, which is why it scores where it does; it is on this page because external monitoring is a real requirement and pretending otherwise would not serve the reader.
Side by side
| Statping-ng | UptimeRobot | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 78 | 48 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Local-first | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Proprietary (hosted service) |
| Pricing | Free and open source. One binary, no database server required for small setups. | Free tier: 50 monitors at 5-minute checks, with a public status page. Paid plans add 30-second intervals, SMS/voice alerts and multi-location checks. Checked 2026-08-01. |
Statping-ng edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
Statping-ng
Strengths
- +Single binary with a good-looking status page out of the box
- +No database server needed for small deployments
- +GPL-3.0 with no enterprise carve-out
- +Lightweight enough for the smallest VPS
Trade-offs
- −Last commit 2025-06-04 — effectively dormant, and it is internet-facing
- −Small community, so few answers when something breaks
- −Fewer notification integrations than Uptime Kuma
- −Uptime Kuma does everything it does and is actively maintained
UptimeRobot
Strengths
- +Checks from outside your network — the one thing self-hosting cannot do
- +Free tier covers 50 monitors, which is genuinely enough for most people
- +Nothing to install, patch or keep running
- +Multi-location verification cuts false alarms from transient network blips
Trade-offs
- −Proprietary and hosted — you do not own the monitoring or its history
- −Free tier is capped at 5-minute checks, so a short outage can be missed
- −SMS and voice alerts are paid add-ons
- −Your uptime data lives in a third party's system
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-01. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.