</>macrostack
Head-to-head · Uptime & status monitoring

Uptime Kuma vs Statping-ng

Both are alternatives to Atlassian Statuspage. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.

Also searched as Statping-ng vs Uptime Kuma — same comparison, one verdict.

96

Uptime Kuma

TOP PICK

The self-hosted monitor that beat the paid ones on features.

OPEN SOURCEMITSELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring tool that does, for free and on your own server, most of what the paid services charge monthly for: HTTP, TCP, ping, DNS and keyword checks, 60-second intervals, a genuinely good dashboard, public status pages, and notifications to more than ninety services including Slack, Discord, Telegram, email and webhooks. It runs as one Docker container on hardware you already have. At roughly 89.7k GitHub stars it is one of the most-starred self-hosted projects in existence, and that popularity is deserved rather than fashionable — the free tiers of the commercial services are more limited than this is. MIT licensed, pushed to daily.

78

Statping-ng

A self-hosted status page in one binary — but check the commit dates.

OPEN SOURCEGPL-3.0SELF-HOSTLOCAL-FIRST

Statping-ng is the community continuation of Statping: a single Go binary that monitors services and renders a public status page, with no database server required for small deployments. GPL-3.0, and the design is genuinely nice. The reason it is ranked where it is rather than higher is a fact worth stating plainly: its last push was 2025-06-04, more than a year ago. That is not automatically disqualifying for a small, feature-complete tool, but unmaintained software that faces the public internet is a security decision rather than a convenience one, and anyone choosing it should do so knowingly.

Side by side

 Uptime KumaStatping-ng
Sovereignty Score9678
Open sourceYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Local-firstYesYes
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
PricingFree and open source. One Docker container on a server you already run.Free and open source. One binary, no database server required for small setups.
The verdict

Uptime Kuma is Macrostack's recommended Atlassian Statuspage alternative, so it's our pick here.

Uptime Kuma

Strengths

  • +60-second checks and unlimited monitors with no plan to upgrade to
  • +Public status pages included rather than sold separately
  • +Notifications to 90+ services out of the box
  • +MIT, one container, and the most-starred tool in the category

Trade-offs

  • It runs on your infrastructure — so it cannot tell you your infrastructure is down
  • Single-node by design; no multi-region checking
  • You own updates, backups and the uptime of the uptime monitor
  • No phone-call escalation or on-call rotation

Statping-ng

Strengths

  • +Single binary with a good-looking status page out of the box
  • +No database server needed for small deployments
  • +GPL-3.0 with no enterprise carve-out
  • +Lightweight enough for the smallest VPS

Trade-offs

  • Last commit 2025-06-04 — effectively dormant, and it is internet-facing
  • Small community, so few answers when something breaks
  • Fewer notification integrations than Uptime Kuma
  • Uptime Kuma does everything it does and is actively maintained
See all 5 Atlassian Statuspage alternatives →

Related alternative guides

Facts verified 2026-08-01. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.