macrostack

neocloud · bare metal · Layer 2.5

OVHcloud

European bare-metal buyers who care about egress costs and data residency.

high portability Portable. The workload is standard enough to move to another vendor without a rewrite.

What you are buying

Business model
Purpose-built GPU cloud. Owns or leases its own datacentre capacity and sells it directly.
How you reach it
You get the physical machine. Maximum control, and every layer above it is yours to run.
Accelerators
H100, A100, L40S, L4
Regions
EU, Canada, US
Pricing model
Hourly and monthly, published, with famously low egress.
Getting started
Credit card.
Capacity
Moderate.
Ownership
Public (Euronext).

Verified 2026-09-09. Fields reading “not published” are exactly that — we do not estimate a figure a vendor withholds.

The counterparty

Public European company with two decades of hosting behind it. Low.

A multi-year GPU commitment is a credit decision wearing a cloud contract. This is the section no benchmark covers and the one that decides what happens to your workload in 2028.

The catch

Support experience is the recurring complaint, not the hardware.

The economics

Low egress is the structural advantage. For workloads that move data, that line beats the GPU line.

No rate is quoted on this page on purpose. Published list prices at this layer move weekly and essentially nobody signing a real contract pays them. Dated, sourced figures live in the GPU cost calculator, where the cheapest and dearest published on-demand price for the identical H100 sit 5.6× apart.

The layers underneath this one

Whatever you rent here is a chip in a building that needs power. In 2026 megawatts, not silicon, are the binding constraint on the whole industry — a frontier rack draws 120–200 kW against a 2026 average near 27 kW, and the US interconnection queue exceeds 2,600 GW.

Layer 2 — Silicon · Layer 1 — Energy · The interconnection queue · Tokens per watt

Compared against

  • OVHcloud vs Scaleway — European sovereignty from a public host against a telecoms-backed one.Compare with Scaleway

Related providers

  • Voltage Park — neocloud, high portability
  • Civo — neocloud, high portability
  • CoreWeave — neocloud, high portability
  • GMI Cloud — neocloud, high portability
  • Nscale — neocloud, high portability
  • Crusoe — neocloud, medium portability

Sources

Macrostack does not benchmark clusters and does not pretend to. For hands-on performance ratings of GPU clouds, SemiAnalysis’s ClusterMAX tests the hardware directly. This page covers what their scorecard does not: who owns the company and how you get out.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.