macrostack
Browse

The AI stack

Categories

Local & Sovereign AINotes & KnowledgeObservability & MonitoringPassword ManagersWeb AnalyticsTeam ChatSmart HomeNetworking & RoutersVideo ConferencingCloud Storage & SyncPhotos & MediaAPI DevelopmentImage EditingWorkflow Automation & iPaaSDeveloper Tools & ContainersOffice & Productivity SuitesNo-Code DatabasesCode Hosting & Git ForgesProject ManagementEmail Marketing & NewslettersScheduling & BookingError Tracking & Exception MonitoringLog Management & SIEMVPN & PrivacyEmail & Secure MailVector Databases & AI SearchLLM & Agent FrameworksDomains & Web HostingData Removal & PrivacyAuthentication & IdentityHelp Desk & Customer SupportCloud & VPSKubernetes & Container PlatformsEmbedding ModelsPDF & DocumentsAI Coding AssistantsAI Voice & SpeechLLM Observability & EvaluationLLM Gateways & RoutingCloud GPU & AI ComputeCI/CD & build automationData & pipeline orchestrationModel serving & inferenceAI agent frameworksBackend as a serviceSecrets managementFeature flags & experimentationProduct analyticsSearch infrastructureUptime & status monitoringAffiliate & partner platformsVisitor identification & personalisationWikis & internal docsIdentity & access managementData warehouses & analytics enginesCustomer data platformsCRMObject storageBI & dashboardsE-signatureWhiteboards & diagrammingIn-memory data stores & cachingPlatform as a serviceTransactional & bulk emailHeadless CMSDesign & prototypingE-commerce platformsInternal tools & admin panelsManaged databasesForms & surveysFine-Tuning & Model TrainingRAG & Retrieval PlatformsLLM Evaluation & TestingAI Guardrails & Content SafetySpeech Recognition & TranscriptionExperiment Tracking & ML OpsDocument AI & OCRCompliance automation & security posture

About

How we rank & score

Layer 2.5 · head to head

OVHcloud vs Scaleway

European sovereignty from a public host against a telecoms-backed one.

OVHcloudScaleway
Can you leavePortable. The workload is standard enough to move to another vendor without a rewrite.Movable with effort. Expect to redo images, storage wiring and networking.
CounterpartyPublic European company with two decades of hosting behind it. Low.Backed by a large European telecoms group — materially different from a venture-funded pure-play.
What it isPurpose-built GPU cloud. Owns or leases its own datacentre capacity and sells it directly.Purpose-built GPU cloud. Owns or leases its own datacentre capacity and sells it directly.
How you reach itYou get the physical machine. Maximum control, and every layer above it is yours to run.You get virtual machines. The familiar cloud model.
AcceleratorsH100, A100, L40S, L4H100, L40S, L4, plus Ascend and other non-NVIDIA options
RegionsEU, Canada, USFrance, Netherlands, Poland
Pricing modelHourly and monthly, published, with famously low egress.Hourly, published, EU-billed.
Getting startedCredit card.Credit card.
CapacityModerate.Moderate.
OwnershipPublic (Euronext).Iliad Group (public parent).

OVHcloud

For: European bare-metal buyers who care about egress costs and data residency.

The catch: Support experience is the recurring complaint, not the hardware.

Economics: Low egress is the structural advantage. For workloads that move data, that line beats the GPU line.

Scaleway

For: EU-sovereignty requirements where the supplier being European is the actual requirement.

The catch: Smaller GPU catalogue than the specialists, and the console assumes you are a general cloud customer.

Economics: Priced to compete in Europe. Sovereignty is the product; the GPU rate is secondary.

Neither table row is a price

Deliberately. Published on-demand rates at this layer move weekly, and essentially nobody signing a real contract pays them — every serious buyer pays less than every list figure either of these companies publishes. Quoting one here would date this page within a month.

The GPU rental price index carries dated, sourced figures instead, and the durable finding there is the spread: the identical H100 rents from roughly $1.38 to $12.29 an hour depending only on who you rent it from.

The layers underneath both

Whichever you pick is renting you chips in a building that needs power. In 2026 that is the constraint that binds: Microsoft has disclosed an Azure backlog it cannot fill for want of megawatts rather than accelerators, and the US interconnection queue exceeds 2,600 GW with roughly 80% of projects withdrawing before they energise.

Layer 2 — Silicon · Layer 1 — Energy · The interconnection queue

Verified 2026-09-09. We do not benchmark clusters and take no position paid for by either company. Where a provider here runs a referral programme it has not moved its placement — the comparison was written before any link was attached.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.