macrostack

Layer 1 · How the heat leaves

Single-phase immersion

Uniform high-density fleets built for it from day one.

The shape of it

Capital cost
High, and it changes the whole facility design
Maturity
proven
Density supported
100+ kW per rack equivalent
PUE
1.02-1.10

Verified 2026-09-09.

The catch

Direct-to-chip is the 2026 production method; immersion is not. Serviceability, hardware warranties and the fact that you cannot mix it into a normal hall are the reasons, not thermal performance — where it wins.

What it actually decides

Best PUE available. Chosen by people building a purpose-built fleet, not by people upgrading a datacentre.

What this is powering

A GB200 NVL72 rack draws 120–132 kW and a GB300 pushes 135–200 kW, against a 2026 average rack of about 27 kW. The silicon decision and the power decision are the same decision, made eighteen months apart.

Layer 2 — Silicon · GB200 NVL72 · The 150 W inference option

Weighed against

Others in how the heat leaves

Sources

Want this whole layer as one table?

The power and cooling options on these pages as a single CSV — lead time, capex, carbon, maturity, density supported, PUE, the catch and what each one decides — ready to sort, filter or load into a notebook.

Get the energy table — free for research and evaluation

Four short lines and the download starts at once (CC-BY-NC-4.0, built from these pages the moment you ask). What you type is used only to answer the request and is never sold. Prefer Hugging Face? Request it there.

Using it inside a product, a client report or anything you sell? That needs a commercial licence.

Macrostack sells nothing at this layer and takes no commission on any option here. That is precisely why this comparison did not exist — everyone qualified to write it sells one of the answers.

The Macrostack brief

New swaps, worth your inbox.

A short, occasional email when we add a high-intent alternative or ship a new head-to-head. No spam, no selling your address — unsubscribe in one click.