SuiteCRM vs Twenty
Both are alternatives to Salesforce. Here's how they stack up — verified facts, no spin.
Also searched as Twenty vs SuiteCRM — same comparison, one verdict.
SuiteCRM
The SugarCRM fork — enterprise features, no licence, no vendor.
SuiteCRM is the community fork of SugarCRM, created when Sugar closed its open edition, and it has been maintained independently ever since. That history is the point: it is another product on this site that outlived its parent's commercial decision. AGPL-3.0, with workflow automation, quotes, invoices, contracts and reporting included rather than sold — the enterprise feature set without the enterprise licence. It is the most complete open CRM by capability and the most dated by appearance, and which of those matters more is genuinely a question about your team.
Twenty
The modern one — built to feel like software from this decade.
Twenty is an open-source CRM built with the design sensibility of a modern product: keyboard-first navigation, a clean data model, custom objects, and an interface that does not feel like enterprise software from 2012. Around 54k stars, which is the most of any CRM here by a wide margin and reflects genuine developer enthusiasm. The licence is mostly AGPL-3.0, with specific files marked `@license Enterprise` under a commercial licence — so it is AGPL-with-carve-outs. It is the youngest option, and the caveat is exactly that: excellent trajectory, short track record.
Side by side
| SuiteCRM | Twenty | |
|---|---|---|
| Sovereignty Score | 91 | 86 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Local-first | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0, with `@license Enterprise` file carve-outs |
| Pricing | Free and open source. Commercial support available from SalesAgility. | Free and self-hostable. Twenty Cloud is a paid hosted option. |
SuiteCRM edges it on the Sovereignty Score, but the right pick depends on the trade-offs below.
SuiteCRM
Strengths
- +Most complete open CRM feature set — workflow, quotes, contracts, reporting
- +Already survived its parent closing the source, which is this site's whole thesis
- +AGPL-3.0 with commercial support available
- +Large existing deployment base and available expertise
Trade-offs
- −Interface is the most dated on this page
- −Heavier to run than EspoCRM
- −Development pace is steady rather than fast
- −Customisation follows SugarCRM conventions that feel old
Twenty
Strengths
- +By far the best interface of any open CRM
- +Custom objects and fields without touching code
- +Enormous community momentum for a young project
- +Keyboard-first workflow that salespeople genuinely like
Trade-offs
- −Youngest here — shortest production track record
- −Enterprise-marked files are carved out of the AGPL
- −Feature set still thinner than EspoCRM's
- −Fewer integrations than any established option
Related alternative guides
Facts verified 2026-08-03. Licenses and pricing change — spotted something out of date? That's a correction we want.